Comparison of Two Simulation Tools to Develop Empathic Communication Skills in Nursing Students Breaking Bad News: A Randomized Controlled Study

Manon Goosse,Isabelle Bragard,Laurence Peeters,Sylvie Willems

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101493

IF: 2.856

2024-02-01

Clinical Simulation in Nursing

Abstract:Background The announcement of a pathology that could have a negative impact on a patient's future (i.e., breaking bad news, BBN) is a common and difficult task that nurses feel unprepared for. This study compared the effectiveness of two online simulation-based training tools: a standardized patient, currently the most commonly used method, and 360° immersive videos, which could represent an alternative that demands fewer resources. Method Sixty-nine nursing students were involved in a randomized controlled noninferiority trial and allocated to one of three conditions: standardized patient (SP); 360° immersive videos (360IV); and control group (CG). In all three conditions, pre, post, and one-month follow-up measurements were based on recorded role-plays with patient-actors and questionnaires. Using recordings, external raters assessed students’ communication skills along three dimensions related to BBN: empathic communication, building shared understanding, and shared decision-making. Right after the prepost role-plays, patient-actors assessed perceived empathy and confidence. Participants completed questionnaires assessing empathy, stress, and self-efficacy. Results Empathy perceived by the patient-actors increased in all conditions, but this increase was only maintained in the 360IV condition. In contrast, the SP condition produced the best communication results, as assessed by external raters. Conclusions The two training tools induced complementary changes in BBN skills among undergraduate nurses, opening up new possibilities for BBN training.

nursing