From Kepler's laws to Newton's law: a didactical proof

Riccardo Borghi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.13405

2020-03-24

Classical Physics

Abstract:An elementary derivation of the Newton "inverse square law" from the three Kepler laws is proposed. Our proof, thought essentially for first-year undergraduates, basically rests on Euclidean geometry. It could then be offered even to high-school students possessing only the first basics of Calculus.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A new approach to the derivation of the law of universal gravitation from Kepler’s laws

P N Antonyuk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2081/1/012012

2021-11-01

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Abstract:Abstract Everyone knows that the inverse square law follows from Kepler’s third law. Let us prove more: the law of universal gravitation follows from Kepler’s third law.

English Else
Revisiting the mathematical synthesis of the laws of Kepler and Galileo leading to Newton's law of universal gravitation

Wu-Yi Hsiang,Eldar Straume

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1408.6758

2014-08-28

History and Overview

Abstract:Newton's deduction of the inverse square law from Kepler's ellipse and area laws together with his "superb theorem" on the gravitation attraction of spherically symmetric bodies, are the major steps leading to the discovery of the law of universal gravitation (Principia, 1687). The goal of this article is to revisit some "well-known" events in the history of science, and moreover, to provide elementary and clean-cut proofs, still in the spirit of Newton, of these major advances. Being accessible to first year university students, the educational aspect of such a coherent presentation should not be overlooked.
A simple derivation of Kepler's laws without solving differential equations

J.-P. Provost,C. Bracco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/30/3/014

2008-12-15

Abstract:Proceeding like Newton with a discrete time approach of motion and a geometrical representation of velocity and acceleration, we obtain Kepler's laws without solving differential equations. The difficult part of Newton's work, when it calls for non trivial properties of ellipses, is avoided by the introduction of polar coordinates. Then a simple reconsideration of Newton's figure naturally leads to en explicit expression of the velocity and to the equation of the trajectory. This derivation, which can be fully apprehended by beginners at university (or even before) can be considered as a first application of mechanical concepts to a physical problem of great historical and pedagogical interest.

Popular Physics,History and Philosophy of Physics
The epic journey from Kepler's laws to Newton's law of universal gravitation revisited

Hai-Chau Chang,Wu-Yi Hsiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0801.0308

2008-01-02

Abstract:In this article, we review the main results of Volume I of Newton's Principia which relates Kepler's law of planets and universal gravitation. In order to clarify the reasoning of Newton, elementary and simple proofs are given to inspire earnest young students. All proofs are based on either the symmetry of spheres or taking great advantage of Kepler's law of area which also reflects the symmetry of centripedal forces.

History and Philosophy of Physics,General Physics
Kepler's laws with introduction to differential calculus

Makar Plakhotnyk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.06537

2017-03-02

Abstract:We explain the solution of the following two problems: obtaining of Kepler's laws from Newton's laws (so called two bodies problem) and obtaining the fourth Newton's law (the formula for gravitation) as a corollary of Kepler's laws. This small book is devoted to the scholars, who are interested in physics and mathematics. We also make a series of digressions, where explain some technique of the higher mathematics, which are used in the proofs.

History and Overview
Newton Revisited: An excursion in Euclidean geometry

Greg Markowsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0910.4807

2009-10-26

Abstract:An interpretation of selected parts of Newton's Principia, with modern notation and methods. Keplers Laws are derived from an inverse square law using Newton's methods.

History and Overview
A Historical Method Approach to Teaching Kepler's 2nd law

Wladimir Lyra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.13386

2020-11-26

Physics Education

Abstract:Kepler's 2nd law, the law of the areas, is usually taught in passing, between the 1st and the 3rd laws, to be explained "later on" as a consequence of angular momentum conservation. The 1st and 3rd laws receive the bulk of attention; the 1st law because of the paradigm shift significance in overhauling the previous circular models with epicycles of both Ptolemy and Copernicus, the 3rd because of its convenience to the standard curriculum in having a simple mathematical statement that allows for quantitative homework assignments and exams. In this work I advance a method for teaching the 2nd law that combines the paradigm-shift significance of the 1st and the mathematical proclivity of the 3rd. The approach is rooted in the historical method, indeed, placed in its historical context, Kepler's 2nd is as revolutionary as the 1st: as the 1st law does away with the epicycle, the 2nd law does away with the equant. This way of teaching the 2nd law also formulates the "time=area" statement quantitatively, in the way of Kepler's equation, M = E - e sin E (relating mean anomaly M, eccentric anomaly E, and eccentricity e), where the left-hand side is time and the right-hand side is area. In doing so, it naturally paves the way to finishing the module with an active learning computational exercise, for instance, to calculate the timing and location of Mars' next opposition. This method is partially based on Kepler's original thought, and should thus best be applied to research-oriented students, such as junior and senior physics/astronomy undergraduates, or graduate students.
On the Bessel Solution of Kepler's Equation

Riccardo Borghi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12010154

IF: 2.4

2024-01-03

Mathematics

Abstract:Since its introduction in 1650, Kepler's equation has never ceased to fascinate mathematicians, scientists, and engineers. Over the course of five centuries, a large number of different solution strategies have been devised and implemented. Among them, the one originally proposed by J. L. Lagrange and later by F. W. Bessel still continue to be a source of mathematical treasures. Here, the Bessel solution of the elliptic Kepler equation is explored from a new perspective offered by the theory of the Stieltjes series. In particular, it has been proven that a complex Kapteyn series obtained directly by the Bessel expansion is a Stieltjes series. This mathematical result, to the best of our knowledge, is a new integral representation of the KE solution. Some considerations on possible extensions of our results to more general classes of the Kapteyn series are also presented.

mathematics
A Modern Interpretation of Newton's Theorem of Revolving Orbits

Nolan Samboy,Joseph Gallant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0166698

2024-01-18

Abstract:Newton's Theorem of Revolving Orbits derives the force that is necessary to explain a particular precession that leaves the shape of an orbit unchanged. Newton showed that for an orbiting body that is already subject to any central force, the inclusion of an additional inverse-cube central force will change that body's angular speed without affecting its radial motion; this leads to the orbit's precession. After reviewing the relevant concepts of Kepler orbits, we present a full description and explanation of Newton's theorem using modern physical and mathematical approaches aimed at a general audience. We specifically highlight the use of the transformation between a rotating reference frame and an inertial reference frame, making this a suitable topic for an upper-level undergraduate mechanics course.

Classical Physics
The laws of planetary motion, derived from those of a harmonic oscillator (following Arnold)

P. A. Horvathy,P.-M. Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1404.2265

2020-08-05

Abstract:Kepler's laws of planetary motion are deduced from those of a harmonic oscillator following Arnold. Conversely, the circular orbits through the Earth's center suggested by Galilei are consistent with an $r^{-5}$ potential as found before by Newton. Both the Kepler/oscillator correspondance and circular orbits are examples of dual potentials.

Classical Physics,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,Mathematical Physics
A new and elementary proof of Newton's "favorite" quadrature formulae

Cezar Lupu,Tudorel Lupu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0701289

2007-01-10

Abstract:In this note we shall give a new proof to a quadrature formulae due to Newton.

Numerical Analysis
An analytical solution for Kepler's problem

András Pál

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14853.x

IF: 4.8

2009-07-01

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract:In this paper, we present a framework which provides an analytical (i.e. infinitely differentiable) transformation between spatial coordinates and orbital elements for the solution of the gravitational two‐body problem. The formalism omits all singular variables which otherwise would yield discontinuities. This method is based on two simple real functions for which the derivative rules are only required to be known, all other applications – e.g. calculating the orbital velocities, obtaining the partial derivatives of radial velocity curves with respect to the orbital elements – are thereafter straightforward. As it is shown, the presented formalism can be applied to find optimal instants for radial velocity measurements in transiting explanatory systems to constrain the orbital eccentricity as well as to detect secular variations in the eccentricity or in the longitude of periastron.

astronomy & astrophysics
Plausibility arguments and universal gravitation

Ricardo F F Cunha,A C Tort

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aa5f8c

2017-03-20

Physics Education

Abstract:Newton's law of universal gravitation underpins our understanding of the dynamics of the Solar System and of a good portion of the observable universe. Generally, in the classroom or in textbooks, the law is presented initially in a qualitative way and at some point during the exposition its mathematical formulation is written on the blackboard and some quantitative consequences are discussed. In the present paper we argue that this approach can be improved by the use of plausibility arguments.

English Else
KEPLER – NEWTON – LEIBNIZ – HEGEL

Abdul Malek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24297/jap.v19i.9106

2021-09-15

JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHYSICS

Abstract:Kepler’s Laws of planetary motion (following the Copernican revolution in cosmology), according to Leibniz and his follower Hegel, for the first-time in history discovered the keys to what Hegel called the absolute mechanics mediated by dialectical laws, which drives the celestial bodies, in opposition to finite mechanics in terrestrial Nature developed by mathematical and empirical sciences, but that are of very limited scope. Newton wrongly extended and imposed finite mechanics on the absolute mechanics of the cosmic bodies in the form of his Law of one-sided Universal Gravitational Attraction, by distorting and misrepresenting Kepler’s profound laws and in opposition to Leibniz’s more appropriate “Radial Planetary Orbital Equation”. The still-prevailing error by Newton (notwithstanding his well known manipulation of science for selfish ends), not only shows the limitation of mathematical idealism and prejudice driven modern cosmology in the form of Einstein’s theories of relativity; but also, have made gaining positive knowledge of the cosmos an impossibility and has impaired social/historical development of humanity by reinforcing decadent ruling ideas. Hegel’s Naturphilosophie is not only a protest against the misrepresentation of Kepler’s Laws in particular; his Enzyklopädie der Philosophischem Wissenschaften is the negation and the direct rebuttal of Newtonian physics and Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, in general. Modern natural science ignores Leibniz and Hegel at its own peril! Kepler’s phenomenological laws of planetary motion and the dialectical insights of Leibnitz and Hegel opens the way for gaining positive knowledge of the dynamics, structure and the evolution of the cosmic bodies and other cosmic phenomena; without invoking mysteries and dark/black cosmic entities, which has been the pabulum of official astrophysics and cosmology so far.
Pythagorean Theorem, Law of Sines and Law of Cosines: alternative proofs via shape derivatives

Lorenzo Cavallina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.16691

2023-08-05

Abstract:We provide an alternative unified approach for proving the Pythagorean theorem (in dimension $2$ and higher), the law of sines and the law of cosines, based on the concept of shape derivative. The idea behind the proofs is very simple: we translate a triangle along a specific direction and compute the resulting change in area. Equating the change in area to zero yields the statements of the three aforementioned theorems.

History and Overview
Newton's solution to the equiangular spiral problem and a new solution using only the equiangular property

Herman Erlichson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0315-0860(92)90005-v

IF: 0.306

1992-11-01

Historia Mathematica

Abstract:This paper is a study of Proposition IX of Book I of Newton's Principia, the problem of determining the centripetal force for an equiangular spiral. In Newton's main proof of this proposition there is an error concerning his reason for the figure SPRQT being “given in kind,” and a very interesting technique of varying things in the neighborhood of a limit. This main proof utilized Newton's formula for the limit of SP2QT2QR given in Corollary I to Proposition VI of the Principia. Newton also gave an alternate proof which utilized his formula for SY2PV given in Corollary III to Proposition VI. The “given” of Proposition IX was “a spiral PQS, cutting all the radii SP, SQ, &c., in a given angle.” Both the main proof and the alternate proof implicitly depend on the property of the equiangular spiral that the radius of curvature at any point is proportional to the pole distance SP. We here offer a new proof of Newton's proposition which does not depend on this implicit assumption.

history & philosophy of science,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
Elementary derivation of the Kerr metric

Kirill Krasnov,Adam Shaw

2024-08-08

Abstract:The main aim of this paper is to simplify and popularise the construction from the 2013 paper by Apostolov, Calderbank, and Gauduchon, which (among other things) derives the Plebanski-Demianski family of solutions of GR using ideas of complex geometry. The starting point of this construction is the observation that the Euclidean versions of these metrics should have two different commuting complex structures, as well as two commuting Killing vector fields. After some linear algebra, this leads to an ansatz for the metrics, which is half-way to their complete determination. Kerr metric is a special 2-parameter subfamily in this class, which makes these considerations directly relevant to Kerr as well. This results in a derivation of the Kerr metric that is self-contained and elementary.

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology,High Energy Physics - Theory,Differential Geometry
Newton on the equiangular spiral: An addendum to Erlichson's account

Curtis Wilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1994.1018

IF: 0.306

1994-05-01

Historia Mathematica

Abstract:In a recent article Herman Erlichson called attention to a flaw in Newton's proof of Proposition IX of Book I of the Principia. How did Newton fall into this error? A valid proof was near to hand, by an easy addition to Lemma III of Book II; but evidently Newton wished to attempt a different line of argument. The figure for Proposition IX in the first two editions of the Principia differs from that in the third edition, and does not involve the quadrilateral “given in kind” that Erlichson rightly objects to. But the basic error remains: the assumption without proof of the similarity of all segments of the spiral with the same central angle. By 1671 Newton had proved this assumption by an integration, establishing the logarithmic property of the equiangular spiral. In Proposition IX it would thus appear that he either simply presented as known an analytic result now familiar to himself, or hoped that his readers would consider it as valid for infinitesimal segments.

history & philosophy of science,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications

From Kepler's laws to Newton's law: a didactical proof

A new approach to the derivation of the law of universal gravitation from Kepler’s laws

Revisiting the mathematical synthesis of the laws of Kepler and Galileo leading to Newton's law of universal gravitation

A simple derivation of Kepler's laws without solving differential equations

The epic journey from Kepler's laws to Newton's law of universal gravitation revisited

Kepler's laws with introduction to differential calculus

Newton Revisited: An excursion in Euclidean geometry

A Historical Method Approach to Teaching Kepler's 2nd law

On the Bessel Solution of Kepler's Equation

A Modern Interpretation of Newton's Theorem of Revolving Orbits

The laws of planetary motion, derived from those of a harmonic oscillator (following Arnold)

A new and elementary proof of Newton's "favorite" quadrature formulae

An analytical solution for Kepler's problem

Plausibility arguments and universal gravitation

KEPLER – NEWTON – LEIBNIZ – HEGEL

Pythagorean Theorem, Law of Sines and Law of Cosines: alternative proofs via shape derivatives

Newton's solution to the equiangular spiral problem and a new solution using only the equiangular property

Elementary derivation of the Kerr metric

Newton on the equiangular spiral: An addendum to Erlichson's account