Additives in Halide Perovskite for Blue-Light-Emitting Diodes: Passivating Agents or Crystallization Modulators?

Nur Fadilah Jamaludin,Natalia Yantara,Benny Febriansyah,Yeow Boon Tay,Bening Tirta Muhammad,Shoba Laxmi,Swee Sien Lim,Tze Chien Sum,Subodh Mhaisalkar,Nripan Mathews
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02232
IF: 22
2021-11-10
ACS Energy Letters
Abstract:Successful adoption of defect management and carrier confinement strategies in Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) perovskites has driven the impressive improvements to performance of perovskite-based light-emitting diodes (PeLEDs) seen to date. Although functional additives have been advantageous in mitigating defects, their influence over crystallization behavior of RP (L2A m–1Pb m X3m+1) perovskites has yet to be fully studied. This is especially important for blue-emitting monohalide RP perovskites, where stringent control over m domain distribution is needed for efficient PeLEDs. Herein, we investigate the effect of triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) on crystallization behavior of blue RP (PBA2Cs m–1Pb m Br3m+1) perovskites. Despite TPPO addition, its absence in the resulting film eliminates its role as a passivating agent. Instead, TPPO acts as crystallization and phase distribution modulatorpromoting the formation of a narrow distribution of higher m domains with higher Br content. In doing so, an enhancement of ∼35% was noted with the champion device yielding efficiency of 3.8% at λ of 483 nm.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,nanoscience & nanotechnology,energy & fuels,electrochemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?