Abstract:Background: Teacher self-efficacy can be defined as the confidence teachers hold about their individual and collective capacity to influence student learning. While many faculty assign and assess student writing as part of their course activities, they often perceive the act of writing as separate from rather than complementary to their teaching of subject matter content. This paper will report on the combined findings of two large survey studies of 385 faculty at Canadian universities, polytechnics and colleges. The purpose of the study was to assess faculty individual and collective self-efficacy for teaching writing. Methods: Data was collected from faculty via an electronic survey distributed by email or social media (Twitter). Faculty responded to the Individual and Collective Self-Efficacy for Teaching Writing Scales. They also responded to open-ended questions asking them to relate how they felt about their abilities to guide student writing. Results: Participants’ average age was 49.9 years with 14.5 years of teaching experience. Participants reported their individual self-efficacy for teaching writing at 77.2% while feeling that their departments as a whole were only 60% confident at teaching writing. Higher individual self-efficacy for teaching writing were found in faculty who were in combined research and teaching positions, PhD prepared, with prior formal education in teaching writing, and with 20 or more years of teaching experience. No statistically significant findings were observed with the Collective Self-Efficacy scale. From the qualitative survey data three themes were identified: 1) Blaming and lamenting; 2) Is teaching writing our responsibility? 3) Hopeful efforts and recognitions. Conclusion: Overall, the data is rife with narratives of blaming students and institutions for student inability to write and faculty questioning their role as writing instructor. These narratives drown out the narratives of faculty who have a passion for teaching writing. Future research should focus on the development of formalized workshops to support faculty teaching writing and changing their attitudes toward the developmental and disciplinary shared responsibility of writing instruction in higher education.

The Teacher-Student Writing Conference and the Desire for Intimacy

The Academic Conference in Fiction

Individual and Collective Self-Efficacy for Teaching Writing in a Multidisciplinary Sample of Canadian Faculty

An Interdisciplinary Model for Connecting Writing, Psychology, and Printmaking.

What About Writing? A National Exploratory Study of Writing Instruction in Teacher Preparation Programs

Co-teaching in higher education: implications for teaching, learning, engagement, and satisfaction

The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship

Explicit embodiment of narrative worlds: a case study of student-teacher concept-led grammar conferencing for writing

The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response

Teacher-written feedback in L2 writing education: Insights into student tensions and responses

Intrusive Teaching: The Strain of Care Labor, Identity and the Emerging Majority in Higher Education

Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education

Publishing and flourishing: writing for desire in higher education

Research: “It Doesn’t Feel Like a Conversation”: Digital Field Experiences and Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions of Writing Response

Teaching Methods in Higher Education: The Changing Scene, with Special Reference to Small‐group Work

Mentoring Partnerships in Science Education

Examining Social Presence, Team Cohesion, and Collaborative Writing in Online Teams

Writing from within: how learning to write occurs in a Communication Studies curriculum

Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing from a Sociocultural Perspective

Improving Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Through the Use of Faculty Learning Communities