Abstract:Joanne AddisonUniversity of Colorado DenverI greatly appreciated Zachary C. Beare and Marcus Meade's study of hyperbole in student writing. Research that seeks to understand and honor student writing as it is, rather than deconstruct it in the ways we wish it to be, offers important and uncommon insights about what it means to be literate. As these authors note, given the prevalence of hyperbole in student writing, it is worthwhile to "understand the context, rhetorical rationales, and intentions underlying hyperbolic utterances" (65). As I read this article, I found myself drawn into their exploration of how and why hyperbole is used in student writing and hope to extend their discussion and conclusions.Based on an analysis of thirty-one student essays from eight different sections of first-year writing courses, Beare and Meade identified three rhetorical functions of hyperbole in student writing: argument, narration, and affect. The students used hyperbole to exaggerate claims, descriptions, and emotional/cognitive states (77). Beare and Meade also identified the nine forms hyperbole took in student writing: inflation, deflation, generalization, absolutism, metaphoric, essentialism, assumption, imperative, typographic (77). What is interesting, and somewhat discouraging, about these lists is that neither includes any reference to language play or humor. And here I don't mean humor in service to mere entertainment. Rather, I mean humor that engages us in language play as a strategic communication event in both written and visual texts.Because the authors present us with a descriptive analysis of student writing, it seems that humor simply didn't appear in these essays and likely wasn't taught as a rhetorical strategy. I would wager that humor seldom appears in first-year composition courses as a rhetorical strategy. Beare and Meade's study threw a light on this absence for me given the potential for humor and language play as strategic communication events in student writing. Anne Haas Dyson, Donna Varga, and others studying the language use of young children have catalogued many instances of the use of hyperbole in classroom settings as humorous and strategic communication events. Viewed through the lens of Bakhtin, these events constituted the social work "of shaping the 'relation between me and the other . . . into a coherent performance'" (Clark and Holquist, qtd. in Dyson 9). As I considered the article by Beare and Meade, I wondered about the social work of writing in college composition and ifthere wasn't an opportunity to improve my own writing classes through the critical use of humor and hyperbole with an eye toward the performance of strategic communication events.Let's take the example of Amy from Beare and Meades narrative. During her interview Amy explains: "For me, exaggeration-hyperbole-was really just exaggerating my interest in the subject. So, you know, you write your papers like this is a really important thing and you really need to get this, you know, figured out or whatever. When, really, you didn't care at all" (80). Beare and Meade tell us that Amy is "attempting to explain the rhetorical situation as she understands it: 'So, they [teachers] always tell you, you know, pick something you're interested in. But, I mean, you're not interested in writing a paper about anything.' As teachers, it can be easy to forget that a passion for the type of sustained critical writing privileged in our disciplines has not necessarily been cultivated in student writers" (80-81). If nothing else, Amy was clearly using hyperbole to engage in the social work of maintaining what she viewed as a successful relationship between herself and her teacher as well as the academy writ large despite the clear dissensus expressed in her interview.What if, instead of faking it with the help of hyperbole, Amy were given the opportunity to engage in critical and productive dissensus work through the use of humor and hyperbole? …

Publishing and flourishing: writing for desire in higher education

Academic writing as identity-work in higher education: forming a ‘professional writing in higher education habitus’

Rendering the paradoxes and pleasures of academic life: using images, poetry and drama to speak back to the measured university

Publish, perish, or pursue? Early career academics’ perspectives on demands for research productivity in regional universities

Nurse education today: Between teaching and publication focus

Tipping point: The staff wellbeing crisis in higher education

In wood and word, or, a gloss on documents and documentation in the humanities

Nothing but publishing: the overriding goal of PhD students in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau

Exploring the philosophy and practice of collective writing

Problematizing enterprise culture in global academic publishing: Linguistic entrepreneurship through the lens of two Chinese visiting scholars in a U.S. university

The price of freedom: Open access, editorial labour, and prestige in academic publishing

Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies

The game of academic publishing: a review of gamified publication practices in the social sciences

Embarking on a Researcher Career: Involvement in Writing for Publication

Committed to learn: student engagement and care in higher education

Making academic work more transparent

Writing for Publication as a Native Speaker: The Experiences of Two Anglophone Novice Scholars

The Changing Landscape of Scholarly Publishing (in Finance) – An Author’s view

Post-critical writing praxis as a qualitative researcher

Response to Zachary C. Beare and Marcus Meade's "The Most Important Project of Our Time! Hyperbole as a Discourse Feature of Student Writing"

Belonging as flickering and in flux in academic work: a collective biography