Planning Theory in China and Chinese Planning Theory: Guest Editorial Introduction
Kang Cao,Jean Hillier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213493983
2013-01-01
Planning Theory
Abstract:This Special Issue aims to present an overview of contemporary planning theory debates in China. In our Introduction, we pose two key questions. Our first question is ‘does “Chinese planning theory” exist?’ Zhang (2008) suggests that ‘if planning theory is interpreted as the values, principles and working procedures which conduct planning practices, then Chinese planners already have their own set of theory’ (p. 18). However, the current composition of ‘Chinese’ planning theory is more heterogeneous than this. In 2004, Hok-Lin Leung initiated the ‘Qiushi Theory Forum’, a paper competition which encouraged the exploration of Chinese planning theory from three origins or perspectives, namely, inspirations from traditional Chinese philosophy, lessons from Western positivist philosophy and practices of the socialist market economy. While this, of course, provides excellent guidance on how to explore planning theory with so-called Chinese characteristics, it, at the same time, exemplifies the hybrid nature of current Chinese planning theory. The year 1978, when China initiated its policy of reform and opening-up, marks a distinct turning point in the history of urban planning in modern China. The current urban planning system, with its values, ethics, approaches, laws, regulations and so on, has gradually formed since that time. Evolution of the intellectual enquiry of Chinese urban planning since 1978 may be divided into three stages. We must admit, however, that the evolutionary process is not linear, clear, legible or sequential. Rather, it has taken a course characterized by chaos, ambiguity, conflict and complexity. For this reason, in this Introduction, we do not make any explicit division between stages, which would, in fact, be impossible, as they overlap with each other both chronologically and in terms of content. We do, however, suggest a distinction between ‘planning theory in China’ – theory based on imported ideas – and ‘Chinese planning theory’ – theory developed from Chinese ideas. An early stage of planning theory development since 1978 witnessed a direct borrowing from Western thought, theories and approaches, with an emphasis on theoretical exploration of the ‘fundamental theoretical issues’. Such issues included the duality of urban planning (e.g. centralization and decentralization, control and development), the foundation of planning theory (science or rationality?), ways of thinking of urban planning (dialectic, systematic, comparative, advanced, dynamic, etc.) and so on. From 1978, all kinds of ‘Western’ planning thoughts and theories poured into China and were eagerly engaged as important enlightenments for developing ‘Chinese’ planning theory – what we term ‘planning theory in China’ – finally forming the second origin of planning theory debate mentioned above. Cheng’s paper in this issue exemplifies this trend. 493983 PLT12410.1177/1473095213493983Planning TheoryEditorial 2013