Incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula after distal and midshaft hypospadias repair does not differ among patients treated with or without a protective second-layer: single tertiary centre experience

Andrea Zulli,Alberto Mantovani,Francesca Gigola,Luca Landi,Maria Taverna,Chiara Cini,Giulia Bortot,Laura Olivera,Lorenzo Masieri,Antonio Elia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-024-05926-3
2024-12-17
Pediatric Surgery International
Abstract:Urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) is the most common complication after hypospadias repair, with an variable incidence of 2–35%, depending on defect type. The interposition of tissue between the neourethra and the skin or glans is considered an important factor to reduce the risk of UCF. Literature has focused on the comparison of different types of second layers, but there is still no consensus regarding the best tissue to adopt. By contrast, literature regarding not-covered urethroplasty is lacking. Our aim is to investigate the value of hypospadias repair without a second-layer and to compare the results with hypospadias repaired with the use of an alternative, easily available second layer of periurethral tissue.
pediatrics,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?