Incised Urethral Diversion Reduces the Rate of Fistula after One-Stage Hypospadias Repair: a Single-Center Retrospective Controlled Study

Wang Chenglong,Ma Ning,Wang Weixin,Endo Yori,Chen Wen,Li Senkai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03732-3
2021-01-01
World Journal of Urology
Abstract:Objective Urethrocutaneous fistula is the most prevalent complication after hypospadias repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether incised urethral diversion was superior to traditional transurethral diversion in minimizing complications. Patients and methods We retrospectively collected and analyzed 113 cases with proximal penile or penoscrotal hypospadias that were repaired by one-stage transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty between January 2016 and January 2020. Of those cases, 60 used incised urethral diversion (group A), whereas the remaining 53 were managed by transurethral diversion (group B) for urinary drainage after surgery. Postoperative complications in both groups were assessed for fistula, urethral diverticulum, meatal stenosis, wound infection, and distal urethral breakdown. Results Fistula was reported in 2 patients (3.3%) in group A, while it was observed in 15 patients (28.3%) in group B ( p < 0.001). Wound infection occurred in one patient (1.7%) in group A, compared with six patients (11.3%) in group B ( p < 0.05). The incidence rates of distal urethral breakdown were 1.7% (1/60) and 11.3% (6/53) for group A and group B, respectively ( p < 0.05). One patient (1.7%) in group A and three patients (5.7%) in group B had a meatal stenosis ( p > 0.05). There were two patients who developed urethral diverticulum in either group ( p > 0.05). Conclusions The use of incised urethral diversion for urinary drainage had an advantage over transurethral diversion in one-stage hypospadias repair with respect to the post-operational fistula occurrence, wound infection, and distal urethral breakdown.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?