How we can solve the crisis in UK gambling policy

May CI van Schalkwyk,Rebecca Cassidy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q16

2024-01-05

BMJ

Abstract:We are at a perilous moment in the regulation of gambling in the UK. We must choose between continuing with the current laws, designed to protect and expand the gambling industry, or changing our approach to focus on preventing gambling harm. The incremental changes to gambling regulation proffered by the government's white paper1 are superficially appealing, but limited reforms will ultimately help to conserve flawed legislation. A new Gambling Act, founded on public health principles, is needed urgently.23Implementing a statutory levy on gambling operators will not be sufficient to reduce the harms. On the contrary, taking money from the gambling industry entrenches the dangerous idea that the industry can grow without limits, as long as it pays for the harm it causes.4 Given what we know about gambling harms, ranging from family breakdowns and job losses to homelessness and suicide,5 we should be asking questions that are not covered by...

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the crisis existing in the UK gambling policy. Specifically, the author points out that the current gambling policy has failed to achieve fundamental changes and instead maintains a harmful legislative framework. The paper mainly focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Defects of the existing law**: The existing Gambling Act 2005 has been defective from the very beginning. It was designed to protect and expand the gambling industry rather than prevent the harm caused by gambling. Therefore, a new Gambling Act is needed to make fundamental changes based on the principle of public health.

2. **Inadequacies of regulatory agencies**: Currently, the departments responsible for gambling regulation (such as the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, DCMS) lack in - depth understanding of the impact of gambling harm and do not have clear and measurable goals to reduce harm. This regulatory mechanism cannot effectively deal with the public health risks brought by gambling.

3. **Conflicts of interest**: The funds of the gambling industry dominate the processes of research, education and governance, seriously undermining the independence of these fields. This dependency not only affects the objectivity of research but also makes the gambling industry be regarded as part of the solution rather than the root of the problem.

4. **The wrong framework of personal responsibility**: Blaming gambling problems on personal responsibility while ignoring the influence of industry structure and policy. This framework not only misleads the public but also conceals the extensiveness and complexity of gambling harm.

5. **Dependence on funding sources**: The gambling industry maintains close ties with research, education and treatment services through funding. This dependency makes it difficult for public health policies to be truly independent and effectively prevent gambling harm.

In conclusion, the paper aims to call on policymakers and health professionals to take action to promote the introduction of a new Gambling Act, thoroughly reform the gambling regulatory system based on the principle of public health, and thus effectively prevent and reduce various harms brought by gambling.