Discussion of Papers by Frank, and Robbins & Wallerstein.

John M . Butler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10036-003

2024-02-23

Abstract:Comments on papers by J. D. Frank (see record 1959-08550-001) and L. L. Robbins and R. S. Wallerstein (see record 1959-08550-002) regarding experimental controls and experimental design of research into psychotherapy, respectively. In my view, Dr. Frank has shown quite clearly the difficulties and problems of conducting controlled experimentation in psychotherapy. The Robbins and Wallerstein paper, however, like all exploratory studies, is complex and its very complexity to my mind is likely to produce as much or more in the way of hypotheses as of established results. The author's conclusion is that at the present stage of development of our field there is no real choice as between naturalistic, clinical approaches to investigation, however, true it may be that experimental research is our ultimate goal and criterion. It seems to me that our best approach to the congery of problems embodied in the word control is, to paraphrase a distinguished physical scientist, to do our damnest with our minds in our area of investigation without worrying too much about formal problems of about how "scientific" we are. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)

multidisciplinary sciences