Combined mild hydrocracking and fluid catalytic cracking process for efficient conversion of light cycle oil into high-quality gasoline

Peipei Miao,Xiaolin Zhu,Yangling Guo,Jie Miao,Mengyun Yu,Chunyi Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120364

IF: 7.4

2021-05-01

Fuel

Abstract:<p>The hydrocracking process and the combined process of hydrogenation and catalytic cracking (HCC) are the common processes to convert inferior light cycle oil (LCO) into gasoline. In this work, the two processes were investigated and compared systematically. Based on the analysis of product distribution and hydrocarbon composition, it was found that, the higher hydrogen transfer reactivity of hydrogenated LCO in HCC process had an adverse effect on the yield of gasoline. While for the hydrocracking technology, the high conversion of LCO and high quality of gasoline were hardly satisfied simultaneously. In contrast, the mild hydrocracking process not only contributed to the ring-opening reaction of naphtheno-aromatics efficiently, but also yielded a higher content of aromatics in the gasoline product. The as-obtained unreacted light cycle oil (ULCO) from mild hydrocracking could be further treated in the fluid catalytic cracking unit, and the operating conditions for maximum high-quality gasoline production were optimized herein. Ultimately, a novel combined process of mild hydrocracking and catalytic cracking (MHC-FCC) was proposed. In the MHC-FCC process, LCO was primarily hydrocracked mildly, and then the ULCO was separated and subjected to catalytic cracking reaction, achieving a satisfying conversion ~85 wt% and high yield of high-quality gasoline ~65 wt%.</p>

energy & fuels,engineering, chemical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily focuses on addressing the issue of converting Light Cycle Oil (LCO) into high-quality gasoline. Specifically:

1. **Market Demand and Existing Technology Limitations**:
- With the increase in automobile consumption in China, the market demand for gasoline is rising year by year.
- Although Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) technology can convert inferior heavy oil into gasoline and other high-value-added products, the quality of LCO in its products is poor, with high sulfur and nitrogen content and low cetane number.

2. **Comparison of LCO Treatment Methods**:
- When FCC technology is used alone, the LCO conversion rate is low, and the gasoline yield is not high.
- Although hydrocracking technology can increase gasoline yield, to pursue higher conversion rates and gasoline yields, higher intensity hydrocracking conditions are usually adopted in the industry. This not only significantly increases hydrogen consumption but may also lead to a decline in gasoline quality.

3. **Proposal of a New Combined Process**:
- The paper proposes a new combined process—Mild Hydrocracking and Fluid Catalytic Cracking (MHC-FCC), aimed at solving the above problems.
- In this process, LCO first undergoes mild hydrocracking treatment, and then the unreacted LCO (ULCO) is separated and sent to the fluid catalytic cracking unit for further cracking, ultimately achieving a higher conversion rate (about 85%) and a high yield of high-quality gasoline (about 65%).

Through this combined process, researchers aim to improve the LCO conversion rate while ensuring that the produced gasoline is of high quality, thereby meeting the Chinese market's demand for high-quality gasoline.