Abstract:As a new programming paradigm, deep learning (DL) has achieved impressive performance in areas such as image processing and speech recognition, and has expanded its application to solve many real-world problems. However, neural networks and DL are normally black-box systems; even worse, DL-based software are vulnerable to threats from abnormal examples, such as adversarial and backdoored examples constructed by attackers with malicious intentions as well as unintentionally mislabeled samples. Therefore, it is important and urgent to detect such abnormal examples. Although various detection approaches have been proposed respectively addressing some specific types of abnormal examples, they suffer from some limitations; until today, this problem is still of considerable interest. In this work, we first propose a novel characterization to distinguish abnormal examples from normal ones based on the observation that abnormal examples have significantly different (adversarial) robustness from normal ones. We systemically analyze those three different types of abnormal samples in terms of robustness and find that they have different characteristics from normal ones. As robustness measurement is computationally expensive and hence can be challenging to scale to large networks, we then propose to effectively and efficiently measure robustness of an input sample using the cost of adversarially attacking the input, which was originally proposed to test robustness of neural networks against adversarial examples. Next, we propose a novel detection method, named attack as detection (A 2 D for short), which uses the cost of adversarially attacking an input instead of robustness to check if it is abnormal. Our detection method is generic, and various adversarial attack methods could be leveraged. Extensive experiments show that A 2 D is more effective than recent promising approaches that were proposed to detect only one specific type of abnormal examples. We also thoroughly discuss possible adaptive attack methods to our adversarial example detection method and show that A 2 D is still effective in defending carefully designed adaptive adversarial attack methods—for example, the attack success rate drops to 0% on CIFAR10.

ARDST: An Adversarial‐Resilient Deep Symbolic Tree for Adversarial Learning

Attack As Defense: Characterizing Adversarial Examples Using Robustness.

ARTEMIS: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Via Distribution Shift

Attack As Detection: Using Adversarial Attack Methods to Detect Abnormal Examples.

A Universal Defense Strategy Against Adversarial Attacks Based on Attention-Guided

Improving Model Robustness Against Adversarial Examples with Redundant Fully Connected Layer.

Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Data

Enhancing Model Robustness By Incorporating Adversarial Knowledge Into Semantic Representation

Adversarial robustness improvement for deep neural networks

Deep Defense: Training DNNs with Improved Adversarial Robustness

DeepDefense: Training Deep Neural Networks with Improved Robustness.

Exploring Architectural Ingredients of Adversarially Robust Deep Neural Networks

Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Transfer-based Adversarial Attacks via Data-centric Robust Learning

Defense without Forgetting: Continual Adversarial Defense with Anisotropic & Isotropic Pseudo Replay

Dynamic Defense Approach for Adversarial Robustness in Deep Neural Networks via Stochastic Ensemble Smoothed Model

Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary Defense

Value at Adversarial Risk: A Graph Defense Strategy Against Cost-Aware Attacks

Dynamic Label Adversarial Training for Deep Learning Robustness Against Adversarial Attacks

AROID: Improving Adversarial Robustness Through Online Instance-Wise Data Augmentation

Fool Attackers by Imperceptible Noise: A Privacy-Preserving Adversarial Representation Mechanism for Collaborative Learning

Adversarial alignment: Breaking the trade-off between the strength of an attack and its relevance to human perception