Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) are key components for the implementation of autonomy in systems that operate in highly complex and unpredictable environments (self-driving cars, smart traffic systems, smart manufacturing, etc.). It is well known that DNNs are vulnerable to adversarial examples, i.e. minimal and usually imperceptible perturbations, applied to their inputs, leading to false predictions. This threat poses critical challenges, especially when DNNs are deployed in safety or security-critical systems, and renders as urgent the need for defences that can improve the trustworthiness of DNN functions. Adversarial training has proven effective in improving the robustness of DNNs against a wide range of adversarial perturbations. However, a general framework for adversarial defences is needed that will extend beyond a single-dimensional assessment of robustness improvement; it is essential to consider simultaneously several distance metrics and adversarial attack strategies. Using such an approach we report the results from extensive experimentation on adversarial defence methods that could improve DNNs resilience to adversarial threats. We wrap up by introducing a general adversarial training methodology, which, according to our experimental results, opens prospects for an holistic defence against a range of diverse types of adversarial perturbations.
computer science, cybernetics, artificial intelligence,engineering, electrical & electronic
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the vulnerability of deep neural networks (DNNs) when facing adversarial examples. Specifically, DNNs are susceptible to small and usually imperceptible input perturbations, leading to incorrect predictions. This threat is particularly serious when DNNs are deployed in security - or safety - critical systems, such as self - driving cars, intelligent transportation systems, intelligent manufacturing, etc. Therefore, improving the robustness of DNNs against various adversarial attacks and enhancing their credibility has become an urgent problem to be solved.
The paper aims to improve the robustness of DNNs by proposing a comprehensive adversarial training method that simultaneously considers multiple distance metrics and adversarial attack strategies. This method is not limited to single - dimensional robustness evaluation but provides a comprehensive framework for adversarial defense. According to the experimental results, the proposed adversarial training method shows potential in improving the resistance of DNNs to multiple types of adversarial perturbations, thus making it possible to achieve comprehensive defense.
### Main contributions of the paper
1. **Extensive experiments on adversarial attacks**:
- Conducted extensive experiments on the most harmful representative adversarial attacks and systematically evaluated their effects (including adversarial image quality, attack success rate, classification accuracy, confidence score, and \(L_p\) distance metric).
- The experiments covered deep neural networks with different complexities (convolutional neural networks and residual neural networks with different numbers of parameters).
2. **Adversarial Robustness Evaluation Benchmark (AREB)**:
- Based on the experimental results, proposed a benchmark (AREB) that can support a comprehensive evaluation of adversarial defense methods.
3. **Effectiveness analysis of pre - processing defenses**:
- Analyzed the effectiveness of various input transformation methods (pre - processing defenses), which reduce the available space of adversarial examples by "compressing" the input space of the model.
4. **Comprehensive adversarial robustness improvement techniques**:
- Proposed a set of technical roadmaps aimed at comprehensively improving the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks and evaluating their effectiveness.
### Classification of adversarial attack methods
The paper also introduced a classification system for adversarial attack methods based on the following key features:
- **Model knowledge**: white - box attacks and black - box attacks.
- **Attack target**: targeted attacks and non - targeted attacks.
- **Attack strategy**: sensitivity analysis, optimization, and generation methods.
- **\(L_p\) norm**: \(L_0\), \(L_1\), \(L_2\) and \(L_\infty\).
### Adversarial attacks in the physical world
The paper also discussed adversarial attacks in the physical world, that is, adversarial attacks implemented in the real environment. For example, by placing stickers in specific positions on traffic signs, it is possible to deceive the most advanced image classifiers and object detectors. These attacks demonstrate the potential threat of adversarial attacks in practical applications.
### Comprehensive Adversarial Robustness Evaluation Benchmark (AREB)
In order to evaluate the robustness of the model under multiple adversarial attacks, the paper introduced the AREB benchmark. AREB includes a series of representative attack methods, covering different model knowledge, attack targets, attack strategies, and \(L_p\) norms. The purpose of AREB is to provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating the performance of the model when facing multiple types of adversarial attacks.
### Experimental results
The paper evaluated the effectiveness of various defense methods by conducting experiments on different types of adversarial attacks. The experimental results show that the comprehensive adversarial training method has significant advantages in improving the robustness of the model.
### Conclusion
The methods and frameworks proposed in the paper provide a feasible path for improving the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks. By comprehensively considering multiple attack strategies and defense methods, the performance and reliability of the model when facing adversarial attacks can be significantly improved.