Abstract:It is important that climate models can accurately simulate the terrestrial carbon cycle in the Arctic due to the large and potentially labile carbon stocks found in permafrost-affected environments, which can lead to a positive climate feedback, along with the possibility of future carbon sinks from northward expansion of vegetation under climate warming. Here we evaluate the simulation of tundra carbon stocks and fluxes in three land surface schemes that each form part of major Earth system models (JSBACH, Germany; JULES, UK; ORCHIDEE, France). We use a site-level approach in which comprehensive, high-frequency datasets allow us to disentangle the importance of different processes. The models have improved physical permafrost processes and there is a reasonable correspondence between the simulated and measured physical variables, including soil temperature, soil moisture and snow. We show that if the models simulate the correct leaf area index (LAI), the standard C3 photosynthesis schemes produce the correct order of magnitude of carbon fluxes. Therefore, simulating the correct LAI is one of the first priorities. LAI depends quite strongly on climatic variables alone, as we see by the fact that the dynamic vegetation model can simulate most of the differences in LAI between sites, based almost entirely on climate inputs. However, we also identify an influence from nutrient limitation as the LAI becomes too large at some of the more nutrient-limited sites. We conclude that including moss as well as vascular plants is of primary importance to the carbon budget, as moss contributes a large fraction to the seasonal CO2 flux in nutrient-limited conditions. Moss photosynthetic activity can be strongly influenced by the moisture content of moss, and the carbon uptake can be significantly different from vascular plants with a similar LAI. The soil carbon stocks depend strongly on the rate of input of carbon from the vegetation to the soil, and our analysis suggests that an improved simulation of photosynthesis would also lead to an improved simulation of soil carbon stocks. However, the stocks are also influenced by soil carbon burial (e.g. through cryoturbation) and the rate of heterotrophic respiration, which depends on the soil physical state. More detailed below-ground measurements are needed to fully evaluate biological and physical soil processes. Furthermore, even if these processes are well modelled, the soil carbon profiles cannot resemble peat layers as peat accumulation processes are not represented in the models. Thus, we identify three priority areas for model development: (1) dynamic vegetation including (a) climate and (b) nutrient limitation effects; (2) adding moss as a plant functional type; and an (3) improved vertical profile of soil carbon including peat processes.

Earth system models must include permafrost carbon processes

Permafrost Carbon: Progress on Understanding Stocks and Fluxes Across Northern Terrestrial Ecosystems

Variability in the Sensitivity among Model Simulations of Permafrost and Carbon Dynamics in the Permafrost Region Between 1960 and 2009

Identifying Barriers to Estimating Carbon Release From Interacting Feedbacks in a Warming Arctic

Dependence of the Evolution of Carbon Dynamics in the Northern Permafrost Region on the Trajectory of Climate Change

A review on mathematical modeling of microbial and plant induced permafrost carbon feedback

Exploring the interplay between soil thermal and hydrological changes and their impact on carbon fluxes in permafrost ecosystems

Permafrost Carbon-Climate Feedbacks Accelerate Global Warming

The Fate of Deep Permafrost Carbon in Northern High Latitudes in the 21st Century: A Process‐Based Modeling Analysis

Quantifying Uncertainties of Permafrost Carbon–climate Feedbacks

Permafrost and Climate Change: Carbon Cycle Feedbacks From the Warming Arctic

Quantifying uncertainties of permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks

A Simplified, Data-Constrained Approach to Estimate the Permafrost Carbon–climate Feedback

Improving the Simulation of Permafrost Extent by Representing the Multi-Tiling Energy Budgets in ORCHIDEE-MICT Model

Carbon Stocks and Fluxes in the High Latitudes: Using Site-Level Data to Evaluate Earth System Models

Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw

Two decades of permafrost region CO2, CH4, and N2O budgets suggest a small net greenhouse gas source to the atmosphere

A Strong Mitigation Scenario Maintains Climate Neutrality of Northern Peatlands

Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Global Warming. Part I: Model Description and Role of Heat Generated by Organic Matter Decomposition

Path-dependent Reductions in CO2 Emission Budgets Caused by Permafrost Carbon Release

Permafrost carbon feedbacks threaten global climate goals