Claire C. Treat,Anna‐Maria Virkkala,Eleanor Burke,Lori Bruhwiler,Abhishek Chatterjee,Joshua B. Fisher,Josh Hashemi,Frans‐Jan W. Parmentier,Brendan M. Rogers,Sebastian Westermann,Jennifer D. Watts,Elena Blanc‐Betes,Matthias Fuchs,Stefan Kruse,Avni Malhotra,Kimberley Miner,Jens Strauss,Amanda Armstrong,Howard E. Epstein,Bradley Gay,Mathias Goeckede,Aram Kalhori,Dan Kou,Charles E. Miller,Susan M. Natali,Youmi Oh,Sarah Shakil,Oliver Sonnentag,Ruth K. Varner,Scott Zolkos,Edward A.G. Schuur,Gustaf Hugelius

Abstract:Abstract Significant progress in permafrost carbon science made over the past decades include the identification of vast permafrost carbon stocks, the development of new pan‐Arctic permafrost maps, an increase in terrestrial measurement sites for CO 2 and methane fluxes, and important factors affecting carbon cycling, including vegetation changes, periods of soil freezing and thawing, wildfire, and other disturbance events. Process‐based modeling studies now include key elements of permafrost carbon cycling and advances in statistical modeling and inverse modeling enhance understanding of permafrost region C budgets. By combining existing data syntheses and model outputs, the permafrost region is likely a wetland methane source and small terrestrial ecosystem CO 2 sink with lower net CO 2 uptake toward higher latitudes, excluding wildfire emissions. For 2002–2014, the strongest CO 2 sink was located in western Canada (median: −52 g C m −2 y −1 ) and smallest sinks in Alaska, Canadian tundra, and Siberian tundra (medians: −5 to −9 g C m −2 y −1 ). Eurasian regions had the largest median wetland methane fluxes (16–18 g CH 4 m −2 y −1 ). Quantifying the regional scale carbon balance remains challenging because of high spatial and temporal variability and relatively low density of observations. More accurate permafrost region carbon fluxes require: (a) the development of better maps characterizing wetlands and dynamics of vegetation and disturbances, including abrupt permafrost thaw; (b) the establishment of new year‐round CO 2 and methane flux sites in underrepresented areas; and (c) improved models that better represent important permafrost carbon cycle dynamics, including non‐growing season emissions and disturbance effects.

Permafrost carbon feedbacks threaten global climate goals

Path-dependent Reductions in CO2 Emission Budgets Caused by Permafrost Carbon Release

Permafrost carbon emissions in a changing Arctic

Permafrost and Climate Change: Carbon Cycle Feedbacks From the Warming Arctic

Permafrost Carbon-Climate Feedbacks Accelerate Global Warming

Identifying Barriers to Estimating Carbon Release From Interacting Feedbacks in a Warming Arctic

Abrupt increase in Arctic-Subarctic wildfires caused by future permafrost thaw

Warming of Northern Peatlands Increases the Global Temperature Overshoot Challenge

Permafrost collapse is accelerating carbon release

Effect of Methane Mitigation on Global Temperature under a Permafrost Feedback

Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback

Expert Assessment of Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Climate Change

Imminent loss of climate space for permafrost peatlands in Europe and Western Siberia

No respite from permafrost-thaw impacts in the absence of a global tipping point

Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Climate Change: Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle

Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw

Permafrost Carbon: Progress on Understanding Stocks and Fluxes Across Northern Terrestrial Ecosystems

Two decades of permafrost region CO2, CH4, and N2O budgets suggest a small net greenhouse gas source to the atmosphere

Large stocks of peatland carbon and nitrogen are vulnerable to permafrost thaw

Permafrost carbon−climate feedback is sensitive to deep soil carbon decomposability but not deep soil nitrogen dynamics

Simulated responses and feedbacks of permafrost carbon under future emissions pathways and idealized solar geoengineering scenarios