Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between gender diversity and the risk profile of Italian banks during the period 2015–2019. This study examines whether the presence of female board directors or top executives has any significant effect on bank risk-taking. Design/methodology/approach To explore the influence of women on bank risk-taking, the authors analyzed a sample of 387 Italian banks and developed an econometric model applying unbalanced panel data with firm fixed effects and controls per year. Within a multivariate regression model, the authors considered five risk dimensions to verify the effect of gender diversity. Findings The findings suggest that female board directors and executives are considerably more risk averse and less overconfident than their male colleagues, thus confirming a negative causality between risk-taking and gender diversity. The results reveal that banks headed by women are less risky because they report higher capital adequacy and equity to assets ratios. As credit risk in female-led banks is no different from male-led ones, higher capital adequacy does not derive from lower asset quality because it is linked to the higher risk aversion of female directors and top managers. Research limitations/implications From a theoretical standpoint, the results suggest that having women in executive positions entails different risk implications for Italian banks; from a managerial perspective, the results highlight conditions that may promote the role of women in the banking sector. The conclusions are of particular significance because they provide some support for the view that regulators should favor gender quotas in the board management of banks to reduce risk-taking behavior. Originality/value This paper offers an in-depth examination of the risk practices of banks and it attempts to bridge the gap in prior literature on the risk profile of the Italian banking industry given that few empirical studies have examined the determinants of risk-taking in this field, to date. The findings on the higher risk aversion of women directors advance the understanding of the determinants of risk-taking behavior in banks, suggesting that gender quotas in bank boards can contribute to reducing risk-taking behavior. This also unveils some policy implications for bank regulatory authorities.

Gender quotas, board diversity and spillover effects. Evidence from Italian banks

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

Gender diversity and bank risk-taking: an empirical investigation in Italy

From diversity to sustainability: Environmental and social spillover effects of board gender quotas

Does gender diversity matter for risk-taking? Evidence from Italian financial institutions

The impact of board gender diversity on banks' environmental policy: The moderating role of gender inequality in national culture

Quota or Disclosure? Evidence from Corporate Board Gender Diversity Policies

Non-financial disclosure and women on board: Is a mandatory approach on gender quotas effective to increase communication quality?

Female directors and corporate cash holdings: monitoring vs executive roles

Greenwashing, bank financial performance and the moderating role of gender diversity

Gender equality within boards: comparing quota and soft law

Diversity in banking and new firm formation. Insights from the Italian local credit markets

Does board gender diversity affect firm performance? Empirical evidence from Standard & Poor’s 500 Information Technology Sector

Gender diversity and healthcare performance: A quantitative analysis from the Italian health system

Gender‐diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make?

When gender matters: The role of women in mergers and acquisitions

Board Diversity, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies

More is less? Wealth effects of Italian stocks to the increase in allowed voting rights

Environmental Performance in Insurance Companies: The Role of Women

Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence corporate dividend policy? Evidence from French listed firms

Gender diversity and firm performance: when diversity at middle management and staff levels matter