Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

Gender equality within boards: comparing quota and soft law

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

Quota or Disclosure? Evidence from Corporate Board Gender Diversity Policies

Gender‐diverse boards and audit fees: What difference does gender quota legislation make?

Does a “soft” board gender quotas policy work?

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: The Multiple Approaches Beyond Quota Regulations

A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas

From diversity to sustainability: Environmental and social spillover effects of board gender quotas

Women's Leadership and Corporate Performance

Female Representation on Corporate Boards in Europe: The Interplay of Organizational Social Consciousness and Institutions

GENDER QUOTA ON BOARDS IN GERMANY

Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence corporate dividend policy? Evidence from French listed firms

Non-financial disclosure and women on board: Is a mandatory approach on gender quotas effective to increase communication quality?

Mandating Diversity on the Board of Directors: Do Investors Feel That Gender Quotas Result in Tokenism or Added Value for Firms?

Shaking Up (and Keeping Intact) the Old Boys’ Network: The Impact of the Mandatory Gender Quota on the Board of Directors in India

Gender quotas, board diversity and spillover effects. Evidence from Italian banks

Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence

30% Women on Boards: New Law in the Netherlands (2012)

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT: DOES BOARD GENDER DIVERSITY MATTER?

Gender diversity and firm performance: when diversity at middle management and staff levels matter