Abstract:In multiple academic disciplines, having a perceived gender of `woman' is associated with a lower than expected rate of citations. In some fields, that disparity is driven primarily by the citations of men and is increasing over time despite increasing diversification of the profession. It is likely that complex social interactions and individual ideologies shape these disparities. Computational models of select factors that reproduce empirical observations can help us understand some of the minimal driving forces behind these complex phenomena and therefore aid in their mitigation. Here, we present a simple agent-based model of citation practices within academia, in which academics generate citations based on three factors: their estimate of the collaborative network of the field, how they sample that estimate, and how open they are to learning about their field from other academics. We show that increasing homophily -- or the tendency of people to interact with others more like themselves -- in these three domains is sufficient to reproduce observed biases in citation practices. We find that homophily in sampling an estimate of the field influences total citation rates, and openness to learning from new and unfamiliar authors influences the change in those citations over time. We next model a real-world intervention -- the citation diversity statement -- which has the potential to influence both of these parameters. We determine a parameterization of our model that matches the citation practices of academics who use the citation diversity statement. This parameterization paired with an openness to learning from many new authors can result in citation practices that are equitable and stable over time. Ultimately, our work underscores the importance of homophily in shaping citation practices and provides evidence that specific actions may mitigate biased citation practices in academia.

Gender homophily, collaboration, and output

Gender-based homophily in collaborations across a heterogeneous scholarly landscape

Gender-Based Homophily in Research: A Large-Scale Study of Man-Woman Collaboration

Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists

Gender differences in research collaboration

Gender-Specific Patterns in the Artificial Intelligence Scientific Ecosystem

GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT

Explaining heterogeneity in student diversity across economics departments

Modeling observed gender imbalances in academic citation practices

Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men

Gendered hiring and attrition on the path to parity for academic faculty

A gender analysis of top scientists' collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy

Rethinking the Effect of Inter-Gender Collaboration on Research Performance for Scholars.

Gender diversity and firm performance: when diversity at middle management and staff levels matter

Gender and collaboration patterns in a temporal scientific authorship network

Gender and the influence of research environment in topic selection of early-career faculty in STEM

The hidden gender effect in online collaboration: An experimental study of team performance under anonymity

Communities and Patterns of Scientific collaboration

The Continuity and Citation Impact of Scientific Collaboration with Different Gender Composition

Gender-specific homophily on Instagram and implications on information spread

Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars’ work