Essay Review: Piero's Flagellation of Christ Elucidated?
Michael H. Shank
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002182861104200306
2011-01-01
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Abstract:PIERO'S FLAGELLATION OF CHRIST ELUCIDATED? Astrolabes and Angels, Epigrams and Enigmas: From Regiomontanus' Acrostic for Cardinal Bessarion to Piero della Francesca' s of Christ. David King (Boethius: Texte und Abhandlungen zur Geschichte der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften, Ivi; Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, 2007). Pp. xii + 348 + CD-ROM. euro78. ISBN 978-3-515-09061-2.Readers of this journal will recognize with respect name of David King, who has earned an international reputation in history of Islamic astronomy. King is arguably leading historian of astrolabe, for he probably has seen, catalogued, and studied more astrolabes than anyone else, and not only those of Islamic civilization. In main part of this book King returns to an instrument about which he and Gerard Turner published a fundamental article. It is famous astrolabe that Johannes Regiomontanus (1436-76) in 1462 gave to his patron, Greek emigre Cardinal Bessarion (1408-72), a leading intellectual and astronomical enthusiast.1 King's primary focus now is Regiomontanus's four-line dedication to Bessarion, which he believes to be an acrostic that not only identifies figures in of Christ by Piero della Francesca (d. 1492), but also explains structure of this famous, mysterious and controversial painting.King's title aptly warns us not to expect standard fare; indeed, book is unusual from beginning to end. Substituting for author's name on title page is phrase An essay by David A. King inspired by two remarkable discoveries by Berthold Holzschuh. Curious already. As a member of King's 2005 Frankfurt seminar, Holzschuh first proposed key ideas that King takes up. We soon learn that he disagrees with many of King's extensions of his own hypotheses in present book.2 In Notes to Reader, King acknowledges layout problems and missing footnotes that resulted from his rushing book into print. Next, he summarizes book, significance of which he links with extravagant claim (repeated) that his is the first hypothesis [about Piero 's Flagellation of Christ] to be based on a contemporaneous document (p. viii). By this, he means four-line dedication on Regiomontanus's astrolabe. The table of contents includes one prelude and one conclusion, two tributes to Holzschuh, and three interludes interspersed among four parts. Nine appendices (almost half book) discuss various aspects of history of astrolabe, including valuable - and controversial - material on sole surviving astrolabe with a Greek inscription (1062) and on several dozen fifteenthcentury astrolabes that King convincingly links to a Viennese workshop. After useful bibliographical and biographical material, King's acknowledgments broach candidly scepticism with which his critics, many of them sympathetic, from members of his 2005 seminar outward, have greeted his claims. Finally, after index, a CD-ROM inside back cover contains King's claims in form of a 238-slide show (the illustrations, both here and in book, are generally excellent).What is King arguing? This question is not always easy to answer. He took in such an impressive amount of history and art history in a short time that book is not fully digested. On expository grounds alone, it was published prematurely. Its pages offer a profusion of details and correlations - geometrical, numerical, alphabetical, symbolic, and biographical - that lead to sometimes competing claims. The reader is left to figure out when a specific point counts as a thesis, a suggestion, a probability, a coincidence, or a passing thought, and whether a new claim replaces, or should be added to, previous ones. Since King's Summary (pp. vii-viii) and Prelude (pp. 1-12) contain some concise declarative statements of core ideas, I will treat them as canonical, even though they are sometimes inconsistent with later ones:I maintain first that epigram on [1462] astrolabe provided ideas for composition and basic geometrical structure for painting, and second that each of eight images across painting represents at least two persons whose identities are deliberately partially concealed (p. …