Luther and the Mystics by Bengt R. Hoffman (review)
W. Newman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1978.0016
2017-05-15
Abstract:Up until comparatively recent times, Protestant scholars have re. jected any suggestion of the possibility of the influence of medieval Roman Catholic mystical theology on Martin Luther's doctrine on justification and the Christian life. The same is true, a fortiori, of any dependence by Luther on Roman Catholic mystics, such as Johann Tauler and the Frankfurter, the anonymous author of the Theologia Germanica. These theologians have consistently maintained that it was against such theology and piety that Luther launched his reform. To see any of these influences in him is to distort his understanding of the Gospel, and to reduce Luther's doctrine either to the theology of work-righteousness of Roman Catholicism, or the subjectivism of the Enthusiasts. Professor Bengt Hoffman, of the Gettysburg Lutheran Seminary, strongly contends that the opposite is true. In his view, Luther's doctrine on justification and the Christian life does indeed contain elements properly belonging to mystical theology, which he maintains are essential to the understanding of the richness of Luther's thought. Furthermore, he argues that a definite " kinship '', both in doctrine and in piety, exists between Luther and the German mystics, especially, Tauler and the Frankfurter. Nor, in his judgment, is this affirmation to be restricted to the early works of Luther. To fail to take seriously these sources of Luther's doctrine is in fact to distort his teaching, and to dilute the theological significance of Luther's personal experience of the power of the Gospel. Hoffman counters the argument that this approach introduces elements totally foreign to Luther's reform. Too long, he writes, has Protestant theology been dominated by an antithetical approach: whatever is of Reformed and Evangelical theology must at every point be diametrically opposed to Roman Catholic theology. "The quality of Luther's faith'', he writes, " was 'ecumenical ' in the sense that it bonded Luther to an essential element in Roman Catholic reflection which is trans-institutional in nature." Although admitting that his thesis is not one held by the majority of scholars in the mainstream of Luther studies, Hoffman, nevertheless, does not consider himself alone in his position. Several contemporary Protestant and Roman Catholic theologians have written scholarly works
Philosophy,History