Crystal structure and shape selection in the growth of 3D metallic crystallites on layered materials: Fe on MoS 2

Dapeng Jing,Yong Han,Marek Kolmer,Michael C. Tringides,James W. Evans
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2024.122522
IF: 1.9
2024-05-24
Surface Science
Abstract:Nucleation and growth of supported 3D metal clusters or crystallites during deposition on MoS 2 , or on other weakly-adhering layered materials, can potentially produce diverse growth shapes, and even crystal structures differing from the bulk metal. For Fe deposition on MoS 2 , SEM and AFM observations reveal three distinct crystallite shapes. By comparison with atomistic structure models incorporating realistic Fe-MoS 2 interface structures, we conclude that these are: triangular fcc(111) pyramids with sloped {100} side facets; bcc(110) A-frame tents with sloped {100} side facets; and bcc(110) mesas with vertical {100} and {110} side facets. The following picture is proposed for the competitive formation of clusters and crystallites with different structures: (i) small nanoclusters formed at the onset of deposition exhibit facile fluxional dynamics allowing sampling of different crystal structures and shapes; (ii) sufficient fluxionality implies a Boltzmann distribution of sampled structures, and thus coexistence of different structures follows from the demonstrated similar energies for those structures; (iii) growing clusters reach a threshold size above which the characteristic time scale for restructuring exceeds that for cluster growth. Thereafter, clusters are locked-in to a specific crystal structure and shape as revealed by imaging of larger crystallites. Despite a penalty for fcc(111) over bcc(111) pyramids based on bulk energetics, favorable surface and interface energies makes them preferable for smaller sizes.
chemistry, physical,physics, condensed matter
What problem does this paper attempt to address?