Abstract:Being persistent, toxic, and bio-accumulative, Mercury (Hg) seriously affects the environment and human health. Due to Hg's attribute of long-range environmental transport across national borders, especially through atmospheric transport, no country can fully protect its environment and human health with its own efforts, without global cooperation. The Minamata Convention on Mercury, which was formally adopted and opened for signature in October 2013, is the only global environmental regime on the control of Hg pollution. Its main substantive control measures are source-specific: its phasing-out, phasing-down, and other main substantive requirements all direct to specific categories of pollution sources through the regulation of specific sectors of the economy and social life. This Convention does not take a national quota approach to quantify the Parties' nationwide total allowable consumption or discharge of Hg or Hg compounds, nor does it quantify their nationwide total reduction requirements. This paper attempts to find the underlying reasons for this source-specific approach and offers two interpretations. One possible interpretation is that Hg might be a non-threshold pollutant, i.e., a pollutant without a risk-free value of concentration. The existence of a reference dose (RfD), reference concentration (RfC), provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), minimal risk level (MRL) or other similar reference values of Hg does not necessarily mean that Hg cannot be regarded as non-threshold because such reference values have scientific uncertainties and may also involve policy considerations. Another interpretation is that Hg lacks a feasibly determinable total allowable quantity. There is evidence that negotiators might have treated Hg as non-threshold, or at least accepted that Hg lacks a feasibly determinable total allowable quantity: (1) The negotiators were informed about the serious situations of the current emissions, releases, and legacy deposition; (2) the UNEP Secretariat took the position that Hg is non-threshold and should be eliminated to the maximum; (3) European countries, the USA and other western countries were in a better position to regard Hg as non-threshold and push forward a global reduction of Hg emissions and releases to the minimum; (4) the negotiators took the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) as a model; and (5) a fairly large number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) were organized under umbrella NGO networks such as the Zero Mercury Working Group (ZMWG) and the International POPs Elimination Network (IPEN) and made a significant contribution to the negotiation process. The interpretations for the Minamata Convention might similarly be used to interpret the source-specific approach of the Stockholm Convention on POPs and the national quota approach of global environmental regimes on stratospheric ozone and climate mitigation. These two interpretations focus on the features of the pollutants and for this reason may be useful for future negotiators of other international environmental treaties to select appropriate models. They also suggest that the source-specific approach may be adopted in the future for pollutants with similar features of being possibly non-threshold and without a feasibly determinable total allowable quantity.

Can Mercury Influence Carbon Dioxide Levels? Implications for the Implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury

Linking Science and Policy to Support the Implementation of the Minamata Convention on Mercury

Minamata Convention on Mercury: Chinese Progress and Perspectives

A Critical Time for Mercury Science to Inform Global Policy

Implementing the Minamata Convention on Mercury: Will China Deliver?

Ecosystem Mercury Recovery and Health Benefit under the Minamata Convention in a Changing Climate

Minamata Convention on Mercury and the Improvement of the Prevention and Abatement of Mercury Pollution in China

How closely do mercury trends in fish and other aquatic wildlife track those in the atmosphere? - Implications for evaluating the effectiveness of the Minamata Convention

A Holistic Perspective is Needed to Ensure Success of Minamata Convention on Mercury

Interpretation of the source-specific substantive control measures of the Minamata Convention on Mercury

Primary Suppliers Driving Atmospheric Mercury Emissions Through Global Supply Chains

Emission-Limit-Oriented Strategy to Control Atmospheric Mercury Emissions in Coal-Fired Power Plants Toward the Implementation of the Minamata Convention

Meeting Minamata: Cost-effective compliance options for atmospheric mercury control in Chinese coal-fired power plants

Mitigation Options of Atmospheric Hg Emissions in China

Global health effects of future atmospheric mercury emissions

Effects of CO and CO2 on the Removal of Elemental Mercury over Carbonaceous Surfaces

Carbon Neutrality and Clean Air Acts Can Enable China to Meet the Minamata Convention Goals with Substantial Cost Savings

Bibliometric analysis on mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants: a systematic review and future prospect

Our evolved understanding of the human health risks of mercury

Global mercury concentrations in biota: their use as a basis for a global biomonitoring framework

Potential decoupling of CO2 and Hg uptake process by global vegetation in the 21st century