Abstract:Previous studies have shown that people would like to sacrifice benefits to themselves in order to avoid inequitable outcomes, not only when they receive less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion) but also when they receive more (advantageous inequity aversion). This feature is captured by the theory of inequity aversion. The present study was inspired by what appears to be asymmetry in the research paradigm toward advantageous inequity aversion. Specifically, studies that supported the existence of advantageous inequity aversion always relied on the paradigm in which participants can determine allocations. Thus, it is interesting to know what would occur if participants could not determine allocations or simply passed judgment on predetermined allocations. To address this, a behavioral experiment (N = 118) and a skin conductance response (SCR) experiment (N = 29) were adopted to compare participants' preferences for advantageous inequity directly when allocations were determined and when allocations were predetermined in an allocating task. In the determined condition, participants could divide by themselves a sum of money between themselves and a matched person, whereas in the predetermined condition, they could simply indicate their satisfaction with an equivalent program-generated allocation. It was found that, compared with those in the determined condition, participants in the predetermined condition behaved as if they liked the advantageous inequity and equity to the same degree (Experiment One) and that the SCRs elicited by advantageous inequity had no differences from those elicited by equity, suggesting that participants did not feel negatively toward advantageous inequity in this situation (Experiment Two). The present study provided mutual corroboration (behavioral and electrophysiological data) to document that advantageous inequity aversion may differ as a function of the individual's role in determining allocations, and it would disappear if individual cannot determine allocations.

When and Why Antiegalitarianism Affects Resistance to Supporting Black-Owned Businesses

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

The role of ideological and intergroup mechanisms in predicting opposition to redistribution and discrimination against the lower social class

Getting by with a little help from my antiracist White friends: Can White antiracism counteract the demobilizing effect of positive contact?

An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

The business case for diversity backfires: Detrimental effects of organizations' instrumental diversity rhetoric for underrepresented group members' sense of belonging.

The Managerial Effects of Algorithmic Fairness Activism

Highlighting Opportunities (Versus Outcomes) Increases Support for Economic Redistribution

Effects of Racial Demographics, Ideology, and Economic Threat on Majority Group Discrimination Claims

Testing the efficacy of three informational interventions for reducing misperceptions of the Black–White wealth gap

Shifts in Racial Inequalities and White Backlash in the 21st Century U.S.

When, why, and for whom is receiving help actually helpful? Differential effects of receiving empowering and nonempowering help based on recipient gender.

The Price of Racial Bias

The presence of diversity initiatives leads to increased pro-White hiring decisions among conservatives.

The politics of allyship: Multiethnic coalitions and mass attitudes toward protest

Benevolent Ideology and Women’s Economic Decision-Making: When Sexism Is Hurting Men’s Wallet

Highlighting health consequences of racial disparities sparks support for action

AI-induced indifference: Unfair AI reduces prosociality

Explaining Antithetical Movements to the Black Lives Matter Movement Based on Relative Deprivation Theory

Co‐brand partnerships making space for the next black girl: Backlash in social justice branding

Who is Willing to Learn About Inequality? Predictors of Choice Exposure to Messaging About Racial Disparities in Air Pollution Effects Among Black and White U.S. Residents