Abstract:Background: Occupational segregation by gender is one of the major problems faced by professional women in the labor market. Since the sixties, psychological explanations point out that gender stereotypes are responsible for this persistent inequality in the workforce. Nevertheless, most of research has overlooked that emotions are particularly important as the discrimination faced by professional women is better explained by the ambivalent feelings they provoke than by stereotyping. Aim: The aim of this research is to analyse from the Stereotype Content Model (SCM, Fiske et al., 2002) and the Behaviors from Intergroup Affect and Stereotypes (BIAS) Map (Cuddy et al., 2007) whether cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain gender segregation in the labor market. Method: 1098 Spanish workers (59% women) from different occupational sectors were requested to rate how professional men and women in high (leaders) and low status (secretaries) positions who work in male (high-tech company) and female-dominated (health company) occupations are perceived (stereotypes), as well as the affective responses and the behavioral tendencies that they arouse. Data analyses: Two analyses of variance (a) and two ANOVAs with repeated measures (b) were carried out to analyze the effect of occupational status (high vs. low), type of company (high-tech vs. health) and workers' sex (men vs. women) on: (a) the social structural variables (status and competition), (b) on the stereotyped dimensions (competence and warmth) and (c) on emotions (admiration, envy and contempt). Finally, mediational analyses were carried out to examine the link between stereotypes, emotions, and behavioral tendencies. Results: The most striking results show that (a) competition and status differentiate leaders and secretaries, (b) men leaders are rated as more competent and less warm than secretaries, whereas women leaders are viewed as more competent than women secretaries but with equivalent warmth, and (c) admiration and envy predict behavioral tendencies, but restricted to professional men regardless of organizational context. Conclusion: Results reveal that cognitive, affective and behavioral components of prejudice act jointly to explain discrimination against women in the workplace. Findings are discussed according to the SCM and the BIAS Map.

Benevolent Ideology and Women’s Economic Decision-Making: When Sexism Is Hurting Men’s Wallet

Benevolent Sexism: Understanding the Factors, Impact, and Implications for Gender Equality

Sex Differences In Social Cynicism Across Societies: The Role Of Men'S Higher Competitiveness And Male Dominance

A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men's power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles.

Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences

Hostile, Benevolent, Implicit: How Different Shades of Sexism Impact Gendered Policy Attitudes

Perpetuating Inequality: Junior Women Do Not See Queen Bee Behavior as Negative but Are Nonetheless Negatively Affected by It

Reducing benevolent sexism: Focusing on its harm against women and pervasiveness

An Underexamined Inequality

“Broad” Impact: Perceptions of Sex/Gender-Related Psychology Journals

Ambivalent sexism and relationship adjustment among young adult couples: An actor-partner interdependence model

Economic inequality shapes the agency–communion content of gender stereotypes

Benevolent and hostile sexism in a shifting global context

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Economic and social consequences of gender attitudes in Eastern Europe – evidence from survey data*

The Effects of Occupational Status and Sex-Typed Jobs on the Evaluation of Men and Women

Gender Bias, Investments in Children, and Bequests

Breadwinners and caregivers: Examining the global relationship between gender norms and economic behavior

How do disadvantaged groups perceive allies? Women's perceptions of men who confront sexism in an egalitarian or paternalistic way

More on the Influence of Gender Equality on Gender Differences in Economic Preferences

Income under female versus male control: hypotheses from a theory of gender stratification and data from the Third World