Abstract:Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a complex 3-dimensional (3D) hip abnormality that can cause hip pain and osteoarthritis in young and active patients of childbearing age. Imaging is static and based on 2-dimensional radiographs or computed tomography (CT) scans. Recently, CT-based 3D impingement simulation was introduced for patient-specific assessments of hip deformities, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a radiation-free alternative for surgical planning before hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To (1) investigate the difference between 3D models of the hip, (2) correlate the location of hip impingement and range of motion (ROM), and (3) correlate diagnostic parameters while comparing CT- and MRI-based osseous 3D models of the hip in symptomatic patients with FAI. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors performed an institutional review board-approved comparative and retrospective study of 31 hips in 26 symptomatic patients with FAI. We compared CT- and MRI-based osseous 3D models of the hip in the same patients. 3D CT scans (slice thickness, 1 mm) of the entire pelvis and the distal femoral condyles were obtained. Preoperative MRI of the hip was performed including an axial-oblique T1 VIBE sequence (slice thickness, 1 mm) and 2 axial anisotropic (1.2 x 1.2 x 1 mm) T1 VIBE Dixon sequences of the entire pelvis and the distal femoral condyles. Threshold-based semiautomatic reconstruction of 3D models was performed using commercial software. CT- and MRI-based 3D models were compared with specifically developed software. Results: (1) The difference between MRI- and CT-based 3D models was less than 1 mm for the proximal femur and the acetabulum (median surface distance, 0.4 +/- 0.1 mm and 0.4 +/- 0.2 mm, respectively). (2) The correlation for ROM values was excellent (r = 0.99, P < .001) between CT and MRI. The mean absolute difference for flexion and extension was 1.9 degrees +/- 1.5 degrees and 2.6 degrees +/- 1.9 degrees, respectively. The location of impingement did not differ between CT- and MRI-based 3D ROM analysis in all 12 of 12 acetabular and 11 of 12 femoral clock-face positions. (3) The correlation for 6 diagnostic parameters was excellent (r = 0.98, P < .001) between CT and MRI. The mean absolute difference for inclination and anteversion was 2.0 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees and 1.0 degrees +/- 0.8 degrees, respectively. Conclusion: Patient-specific and radiation-free MRI-based dynamic 3D simulation of hip impingement and ROM can replace CT-based 3D simulation for patients with FAI of childbearing age. On the basis of these excellent results, we intend to change our clinical practice, and we will use MRI-based 3D models for future clinical practice instead of CT-based 3D models. This allows radiation-free and patient-specific preoperative 3D impingement simulation for surgical planning and simulation of open hip preservation surgery and hip arthroscopic surgery.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging With a Novel Hip Flexion Scanning Position for Diagnosing Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Diagnosis of Hip Joint Disability in Adults

MRI of Patellofemoral Alignment in Patients with Patellar Tendinopathy

Clinical Value of Optimized Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of Patients with Painful Hip Arthroplasty.

Magnetic resonance imaging should be the first‐line imaging modality for investigating suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries

External snapping hip: classification based on magnetic resonance imaging features and clinical correlation

Iliopsoas snapping hip: improving the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging with a novel parameter

Diagnosing periprosthetic hip joint infection with new-generation 0.55 T MRI

MRI findings and clinical testing for preoperative diagnosis of long head of the biceps pathology

Applying the Pain-Monitoring Model in a Female Elite Tennis Player With Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy: A Case Report

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Diagnosis of Proximal Hamstring Rupture

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the 120° Flexed-Knee Position for Detecting and Classifying Meniscal Ramp Lesion

Magnetic resonance arthrography with positional manoeuvre for the diagnosis of synovial fold of posterior shoulder joint capsule

Nonoperative Treatment of Single-Tendon Proximal Hamstring Avulsions in Recreational Athletes

Achilles tendon assessment on quantitative MRI: Sources of variability and relationships to tendinopathy

Quantitative MRI characterization of arthroscopically verified supraspinatus pathology: comparison of tendon tears, tendinosis and asymptomatic supraspinatus tendons with T2 mapping

Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Dynamic Simulation Of Hip Impingement And Range Of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography-Based Simulation For Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications For Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery And Hip Arthroscopy

MRI‐Based Morphometric Comparison of Lower Leg Muscles and Tendons in Individuals With Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome

Diagnosis of long head of biceps tendinopathy in rotator cuff tear patients: correlation of imaging and arthroscopy data

Is the Tendon-to-Groove Ratio Associated with Elevated Risk for LHB Tendon Disorders?—A New Approach of Preoperative MR-Graphic Analysis for Targeted Diagnosis of Tendinopathy of the Long Head of Biceps

Quantitative Evaluation of Hip Muscle Atrophy in Patients with Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging