Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Surgical outcomes for proximal hamstring avulsion injury (PHAI) are well documented, yet comparative analyses with nonsurgical approaches remain scarce.Purpose:To compare the functional outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical interventions for PHAI.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This comparative study, conducted at a sports surgery center between January 2012 and July 2021, focused on patients with primary PHAI. The study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Group selection involved utilizing propensity score matching to compare an arm of patients who were surgically treated (indications included patients with complete injury, patients with partial injury with >2 cm of retraction, and patients for whom 6 months of nonsurgical treatment failed) with another arm of patients who refused surgery. The primary outcome was evaluated using the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS). The secondary outcomes included the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) score; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score; rate and quality of return to sport (RTS); and patient satisfaction.Results:The study included 32 patients (mean age, 55.8 years [SD, 8.4 years]) in the nonsurgical treatment arm and 95 patients in the surgical treatment arm (mean age, 53.4 years [SD, 7.7 years]) (P > .05). The interval from injury to treatment was 5.7 months (SD, 9.6 months) for the surgical group and 12.7 months (SD, 25.9 months) for the nonsurgical group (P > .05). At the final follow-up (nonsurgical group: mean, 56.5 months [SD, 28.2 months]; surgical group: mean, 50.7 months [SD, 33.1 months]), the PHAS was significantly higher in the surgical group (mean, 86.3 [SD, 13.7]) compared with the nonsurgical group (mean, 69.8 [SD, 15.1]) (P < .0001). Higher activity scores were also observed in the surgical group for the TAS and UCLA scores (P = .0224 and P = .0026, respectively). A higher percentage of the surgical group (68.4%) returned to sports compared with the nonsurgical group (46.9%) (P = .0354), with a greater proportion in the surgical group returning at the same or higher level (67.7% vs 26.7%) (P = .0069). Additionally, a higher satisfaction level was reported by patients in the surgical group (89.5%) in contrast to the nonsurgical group (25%) (P < .0001). Three patients in the surgical group experienced complications (2 reruptures and 1 hyperesthesia at the pudendal nerve territories). Odds ratios (ORs) indicated that patients in the surgical group were significantly more likely to achieve or exceed median scores for the PHAS (OR, 6.79; P < .001), TAS score (OR, 2.29; P = .045), and UCLA score (OR, 3.63; P = .003), as well as to RTS at any level (OR, 2.46; P = .031) or at the preinjury level or higher (OR, 6.04; P 4 years compared with nonsurgical treatment.Registration:NCT02906865 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

Magnetic resonance imaging should be the first‐line imaging modality for investigating suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries

Surgical Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injuries Compared With Nonsurgical Treatment: A Matched Comparative Study With a Mean Follow-up of >4 Years From the Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Surgery Cohort Study

Non‐surgical management of acute proximal hamstring avulsions can produce clinically acceptable results

Nonoperative Treatment of Single-Tendon Proximal Hamstring Avulsions in Recreational Athletes

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Diagnosis of Proximal Hamstring Rupture

Magnetic Resonance Imaging With a Novel Hip Flexion Scanning Position for Diagnosing Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy

The Cobra sign: A marker for overestimation of tendon retraction in proximal semimembranosus tendon avulsion

Efficacy of Diagnostic In-Office Shoulder Ultrasound in the Surgical Treatment of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging as First-Line Imaging Strategies for Rotator Cuff Pathologies: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Practices, Economic Efficiency, and Future Perspectives

Hamstring strain grade on MRI and return to play in elite Australian cricket players

Excellent clinical outcome and low complication rate after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mid-term follow up

MR arthrogram outperforms standard MRI 2 weeks after first shoulder dislocation for labral tear diagnosis

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Avulsion Injuries of the Pelvis and Hip in Adolescent Professional Footballers: A Case Series

Surgical Repair of Distal Biceps Femoris Avulsion Injuries in Professional Athletes

Chemoprotection with botulinum toxin following proximal hamstring-Ischial tuberosity avulsion fracture repair: Running title: Chemoprotection for hamstring avulsion fractures

Association Between Proximal Hamstring Tear Characteristics and Achievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Endoscopic and Open Repair at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Correlation of Player and Imaging Characteristics With Severity and Missed Time in National Football League Professional Athletes With Hamstring Strain Injury: A Retrospective Review

Evidence-Based Management and Factors Associated With Return to Play After Acute Hamstring Injury in Athletes: A Systematic Review

MRI is unnecessary for diagnosing acute Achilles tendon ruptures: clinical diagnostic criteria

Comparison of Ultrasound and MRI with Intraoperative Findings in the Diagnosis of Peroneal Tendinopathy, Tears, and Subluxation

Validation of the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS) in the Evaluation and Follow-up of Patients Operated for Proximal Hamstring Avulsion