Development of a standardized peer review and oversight process in cases of suspected child physical abuse

Aisling R. Geoghegan,William RM. Weiler,Frances Yeung,Emma J. Cory
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102698
IF: 1.691
2024-05-26
Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Abstract:Peer review of medical opinions provided in cases of suspected child physical abuse is generally considered to be best practice for pediatricians engaged in this field. However, there are no published standardized guidelines on how pediatricians should undertake physical abuse peer review including case selection and process. Due to the high-stakes nature in the field of child abuse pediatrics, rigorous quality assurance practices and oversight mechanisms are essential to safeguard children, families, health care providers, and intersecting systems. The Suspected Child Abuse and Neglect program at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada developed a structured peer review process for cases of suspected physical abuse. Included in the process is an approach for the evaluation of institutional complaints received related to a child abuse pediatrician's medical opinion. This quality assurance process is presented so that other child abuse pediatricians and programs may replicate or adapt the protocol for their own local context.
medicine, legal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?