Abstract:Objectives: Cervical spine injuries (CSIs) after blunt trauma in children are rare, but cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department (ED) providers routinely use spinal precautions and cervical spine imaging, respectively, during the management of children experiencing blunt trauma. These practices lack evidence, and there is concern that they may be harmful. A pediatric CSI risk assessment tool is needed to inform EMS and ED provider decision making. Creating this tool requires prospective data collection from EMS and ED providers at the time of patient evaluation. The purpose of this article is to describe the methods used to prospectively capture paired EMS and ED provider observations of children cared for after blunt trauma. Given the rarity of prospective observational research with EMS, the novel use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) in this study, and the potential to inform future studies, we are publishing our methodology in advance of outcome data related to the risk assessment tool. Methods: The study was conducted at four tertiary children's hospitals as a prerequisite for a planned larger study to derive a CSI risk assessment tool. We created a web-based, branch-logic questionnaire using the REDCap data collection system. The survey was administered via tablet computer to ED providers evaluating children with blunt trauma and, if applicable, to EMS providers who provided patient care at the scene. We collected information regarding factors determined a priori to be plausibly associated with CSI in children. Eligible children presenting to the ED after blunt trauma with at least one of the following one of the following were included: prehospital EMS spinal precautions, ED trauma team evaluation, or cervical spine imaging in the ED. Exclusions included penetrating trauma, language barrier, or state's custody. Enrollment occurred when research coordinators (RCs) were available, generally 12-16 hours/day. RCs approached EMS providers prior to departing the ED and ED providers after they completed their patient assessments. An ED provider survey was required for enrollment. Enrolled children were followed for 28 days to determine the presence of CSI (primary outcome) by subsequent imaging or by patient/family telephone follow-up for those without imaging. Results: Over 18 months, we prospectively enrolled 4,144 of 5,764 (71.9%) eligible children, including 74 of 110 (67.3%) children diagnosed with CSI. Enrollment during RC hours was 85.9%. Fifty-three enrolled children were withdrawn from the study. Of those in the final study cohort, 36.5% arrived by EMS scene response in spinal precautions. The remaining 63.5% arrived by EMS scene response without spinal precautions or by private vehicle or interfacility transfer. EMS scene response providers completed surveys for 60.2% of enrolled children arriving in spinal precautions. RCs missed the EMS providers for 37.1% of children; however, EMS declined participation for only 2.6%. Conclusions: Our method of data collection demonstrates the ability to prospectively capture paired observations from EMS and ED personnel for children undergoing evaluation after blunt trauma. While this methodology will be used to implement and evaluate a CSI tool in future studies, it may also be adapted to studies requiring prospective data collection from EMS and ED personnel.

Child Protection Team Consultation for Injuries Potentially Due to Child Abuse in Community Emergency Departments

Barriers to Adoption of a Child-Abuse Clinical Decision Support System in Emergency Departments

Emergency Department Triage Chief Complaints Among Children Evaluated for Physical Abuse Concerns

Developing and Testing the Usability of a Novel Child Abuse Clinical Decision Support System: Mixed Methods Study

The Implementation of a Clinical Pathway to Improve Child Abuse Screening in Young Children With Fractures: A Quality Improvement Analysis

Identifying Child Abuse in Patients With Femur Fractures Through Pathway Compliance: A Pilot Study

What Happens When Child Abuse Pediatricians and CPS Investigators Collaborate? A Study of the Multidisciplinary Pediatric Education and Evaluation Consortium

Standardizing the Evaluation of Nonaccidental Trauma in a Large Pediatric Emergency Department

720 ED Physician and Nurse Experience in Diagnosising and Reporting Paediatric Abuse-Related Trauma in China

Recognizing Nonaccidental Trauma in a Pediatric Tertiary Hospital: A Quality Improvement Imperative

Child Care Health Consultation Improves Infant and Toddler Care

Barriers to medical consultation and strategies for enhancing the prevention and reporting of child abuse: a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of paediatric patients at a tertiary care center in Karachi, Pakistan

Effects of child trauma screening on trauma‐informed multidisciplinary evaluation and service planning in the child welfare system

Pilot study using machine learning to improve estimation of physical abuse prevalence

Knowing Your Patient Population: Techniques to Capture Infants at High Risk for Physical Abuse in a Trauma Registry

Evaluation of Children after Caregiver Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study of Barriers, Facilitators, and Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care

Identifying Injuries Suggestive of Child Physical Abuse: An Innovative Application of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program

Methods for Collecting Paired Observations From Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Department Providers for Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Risk Factors

Abusive Pediatric Burns Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP)

Effect of Routine Child Physical Abuse Screening Tool on Emergency Department Efficiency

96 The Influence of Consulting Child Protective Care Services on Patients’ Length of Stay in Burns