Abstract:Introduction Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a widely used screening test in clinical practice as an indicator of inflammatory and degenerative malignant diseases. The Westergren method, renowned as the gold standard, is valued for its accuracy and cost-effectiveness but demands considerable time and blood volume. Emerging automated methods offer quicker and more convenient alternatives, aiming to replace manual techniques. Nonetheless, validating these automated methods against the reference Westergren method is essential to ensure reliability. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate ESR measurement results obtained from both the reference Westergren method and the automated (SFRI ESR 3000) method. Methods A Hospital-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Jigjiga University Sheik Hassen Yabare Referral Hospital from July 15 to September 16, 2023. Following the acquisition of informed consent, blood samples were obtained from 158 participants, five milliliters of blood from each participant. These samples were then subjected to ESR estimation using both the Westergren (reference) method and the automated (SFRI ESR 3000) method. Subsequently, the collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 and MedCalc version 12.3.0.0 statistical Softwares. Statistical analyses such as Paired t -tests, Pearson correlation, linear regression, and the Bland and Altman plot were employed. A p -value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The paired sample t -test analysis revealed no significant difference between the use of the reference Westergren method and the automated method for ESR determination, with a mean difference (MD) of 0.7 ± 9.2 mm/h ( P = 0.36). Additionally, a significant correlation was observed between the two methods, with a remarkable correlation coefficient ( r = 0.94, p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman data analysis indicated no evidence of systematic bias and demonstrated good agreement of ESR values between the two methods, with a limit of agreement of −17.3 to +18.7. Moreover, within-run imprecision analysis for the automated method across a range of ESR values showed coefficient of variation of 27.08, 12.65, and 10.32% for low, medium, and high ESR levels, respectively. Conclusions The SFRI ESR 300 automated method demonstrates the potential for interchangeable use with the Westergren method for determining ESR, given the strong correlation and good agreement. Additionally, the same reference range could be applied during interpretation.

Method Comparison of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Automated Systems, the VES-MATIC 5 (DIESSE) and Test 1 (ALIFAX), with the Reference Method in Routine Practice

Evaluation of Stability and Accuracy Compared to the Westergren Method of ESR Samples Analyzed at VES-MATIC 5

Challenges of preanalytical variables in erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a CUBE 30 touch evaluation

Comparison of erythrocyte sedimentation rate measurement between Westergren method and automated method among patients attending Jigjiga University Sheik Hassen Yabare Referral Hospital, Jigjiga, Ethiopia

Clinical application of a new method for determination of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate using the BC‐720 automated hematology analyzer

Establishment and Evaluation of an Internal Quality Control Method for ESR Relays

Performance evaluation of the BC-720 auto hematology analyzer and establishment of the reference intervals of erythrocyte sedimentation rate in healthy adults

Effect of storage temperature and time on erythrocyte sedimentation rate

Comparative evaluation of two newly developed devices for capillary viscometry

In vitro evaluation of a new viscoelastometry‐based point‐of‐care analyzer

Evaluation of the Comparability of Wantai Wan200+ Instrument with Routine Laboratory Assays for 21 Different Analytes

Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000

The physics of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

Longitudinal evaluation of laboratory results and method precision in worldwide erythropoietin external quality assessments

Performance Verification and Interference Factors of SYSMEX XN-9000 Hematology Analyzer for the Determinations of Reticulocyte Count and Parameters According to CAP Accreditation Requirements

Early stage of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate test: Fracture of a high-volume-fraction gel

Performance of Synthetic Extracellular Volume Fraction in Different Cardiac Phenotypes From a Prospective Cohort of Patients Referred for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Performance evaluation of the automated nucleated red blood cell count of five commercial hematological analyzers

Performance evaluation of Alfred60AST rapid susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in the routine laboratory workflow

Performance evaluation the new automated Atellica Hema 580 hematology analyzer

[Efficiency Improvement of Fully Automatic Microcolumn Glass Sphere Technology Used in Blood Group Compatibility Tests].