Method Comparison of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Automated Systems, the VES-MATIC 5 (DIESSE) and Test 1 (ALIFAX), with the Reference Method in Routine Practice

Michele Cennamo,Loredana Giuliano,Gloria Arrigoni,Valentina Fardone,Roberta Russo,Luca Maria De Tomasi,Fabio Bertani,Gaetano Cammarota,Giovanni Brunetti,Lucia Del Vecchio,Michelarcangelo Partenope
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13030847
IF: 3.9
2024-02-02
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Background: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a routine and aspecific test that is still widely used. The reference-manual method for ESR determination is the Westergren method. The VES-MATIC 5 is a novel, fully automated, and closed system based on a modified Westergren method. This study conceived the aim of comparing two ESR analytical analysers, Test 1 and the VES-MATIC 5, with the reference method in routine practice. Methods: This study included 264 randomly analysed samples. A comparison between the two methods and Westergren was performed, and they were evaluated for inter-run and intra-run precision. In addition, we investigated possible interferences and different sensitivities to conventional analytes. Results: The comparison of methods by Passing–Bablok analysis provided a good agreement for both systems, with a better correlation for VES-MATIC 5 (p = 0.96) than Test 1 (p = 0.93), and sensitivity studies did not show any significant influence. Conclusions: The VES-MATIC 5 analyser demonstrated excellent comparability with the reference method, and it had better performance than Test 1. It can be employed in routine practice, bringing advantages such as a reduction in the probability of human error compared to the manual method, as well as an increase in operator safety and environmental protection.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the performance comparison between two new fully - automatic erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) analyzers - VES - MATIC 5 (DIESSE) and Test 1 (ALIFAX) - and the traditional gold - standard Westergren method in routine clinical practice. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Compare the accuracy of different methods**: By comparing the ESR values measured by VES - MATIC 5, Test 1 and the Westergren method, evaluate the accuracy and consistency of these two new automated systems. 2. **Evaluate the precision of the methods**: By conducting within - run and between - run precision tests, ensure the stability and reliability of the new systems in daily use. 3. **Detect possible interfering factors**: Study the influence of common factors such as cholesterol, triglycerides, anemia and fibrinogen on ESR measurement results to determine whether these factors will affect the measurement accuracy of the new systems. 4. **Sensitivity study**: Evaluate the performance of VES - MATIC 5 and Test 1 when handling samples with low hematocrit (Hct) and high fibrinogen levels. Through these studies, the authors hope to verify whether VES - MATIC 5 and Test 1 can replace the traditional Westergren method in daily clinical practice and can provide reliable and consistent results. In addition, the study also focuses on the potential advantages of the new systems in reducing human errors, improving operator safety and environmental protection.