Abstract:Background: Evidence regarding the presence and persistence of ethnic inequalities in mental healthcare is well established. The reasons for these inequalities and lack of progress in diminishing them are less understood. This meta-ethnography aims to provide a new conceptual understanding of how ethnic inequalities are created and sustained; this is essential to develop effective interventions. Specifically, we sought to understand why people from ethnic minority groups are underrepresented in primary care mental health service provision and overrepresented in crisis pathways and detention. Methods and findings: Following eMERGe guidelines for meta-ethnographies, we searched OpenGrey, Kings Fund, CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, and Social Care Online databases for qualitative articles published from database inception until October 2, 2022, using broad categories of search terms relating to "ethnicity AND (mental illness/mental health/emotional distress) AND (help-seeking/service utilisation/experience/perception/view)." We included all conceptually rich articles that used qualitative methods of data collection and analysis and excluded non-UK studies and those that focused solely on causation of mental illness. Our patient, public, and practitioner lived experience advisory group provided feedback and input on key stages of the project including search terms, research questions, data analysis, and dissemination. A total of 14,142 articles were identified; 66 met the inclusion criteria. We used reciprocal, refutational, and line of argument analytical approaches to identify convergence and divergence between studies. The synthesis showed that current models of statutory mental healthcare are experienced as a major barrier to the delivery of person-centred care to those in ethnic minority groups due to the perceived dominance of monocultural and reductionist frameworks of assessment and treatment (described as "medical" and "Eurocentric") and direct experiences of racist practice. The lack of socially oriented and holistic frameworks of knowledge and understanding in medical training and services is experienced as epistemic injustice, particularly among those who attribute their mental illness to experiences of migration, systemic racism, and complex trauma. Fear of harm, concerns about treatment suitability, and negative experiences with health providers such as racist care and medical neglect/injury contribute to avoidance of, and disengagement from, mainstream healthcare. The lack of progress in tackling ethnic inequalities is attributed to failures in coproduction and insufficient adoption of existing recommendations within services. Study limitations include insufficient recording of participant characteristics relating to generational status and social class in primary studies, which prevented exploration of these intersections. Conclusions: In this study, we found that the delivery of safe and equitable person-centred care requires a model of mental health that is responsive to the lived experiences of people in ethnic minority groups. For the people considered in this review, this requires better alignment of mental health services with social and anti-racist models of care. Our findings suggest that intersections related to experiences of racism, migration, religion, and complex trauma might be more relevant than crude ethnic group classifications. Strategies to tackle ethnic inequalities in mental healthcare require an evaluation of individual, systemic, and structural obstacles to authentic and meaningful coproduction and implementation of existing community recommendations in services.

Peer review of funding applications for health research in ethnic minority groups must improve

Anti-racist interventions to reduce ethnic disparities in healthcare in the UK: an umbrella review and findings from healthcare, education and criminal justice

Understanding ethnic inequalities in mental healthcare in the UK: A meta-ethnography

What are the ethnic inequities in care outcomes related to haematological malignancies, treated with transplant/cellular-therapies, in the UK?

The experiences of minority language users in health and social care research: A systematic review

Ethnic minority representation in UK COVID-19 trials: systematic review and meta-analysis

Reporting and representation of underserved groups in intervention studies for patients with multiple long-term conditions: a systematic review

Views and experiences of primary care among Black communities in the United Kingdom: a qualitative systematic review

A systematic review to explore factors affecting participation in health research trials amongst underrepresented socio-economically disadvantaged populations in the UK and Ireland.

Factors which influence ethnic minority women’s participation in maternity research: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

A rapid review of the effectiveness of interventions to enhance equitable or overall access to mental health services by ethnic minority groups

Attitudes to and perceptions of workplace health promotion amongst employees from ethnic minorities in the UK: A scoping review

Recruitment, retention and reporting of variables related to ethnic diversity in randomised controlled trials: an umbrella review

Racism, equity and inclusion in research funding

Most UK cardiovascular disease trial protocols feature criteria that exclude ethnic minority participants: systematic review

Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review

The UK research ethics committee: Making the case for better serving the underserved – can we do better?

Successful co-production can help tackle inequalities in maternal health outcomes

Experiences and access of palliative and end of life care for older people from minority ethnic groups: a scoping review

What is the effectiveness of antiracist interventions for ethnic minority healthcare staff? A systematic review.

"We are not invited": Australian focus group results on how to improve ethnic diversity in trials