Most UK cardiovascular disease trial protocols feature criteria that exclude ethnic minority participants: systematic review

Jhulia dos Santos,Shoba Dawson,Carmel Conefrey,Talia Isaacs,Mahwar Khanum,Saba Faisal,Sangeetha Paramasivan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111259
IF: 7.407
2024-01-12
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Abstract:Objectives We systematically reviewed UK cardiovascular disease (CVD) randomised controlled trial (RCT) protocols to identify the proportion featuring eligibility criteria that may disproportionately exclude ethnic minority (EM) participants. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, January 2014-June 2022, to identify UK CVD RCT protocols. We extracted non-clinical eligibility criteria from trial protocols and inductively categorised the trials by their language, consent and broad (ambiguous) criteria. Findings are narratively reported. Results Of the seventy included RCT protocols, most (87.1%; 61/70) mentioned consent within the eligibility criteria, with more than two thirds (68.9%; 42/61) indicating a requirement for 'written' consent. Alternative consent pathways that can aid EM participation were absent. English language requirement was present in 22.9% (16/70) of the studies and 37.1% (26/70) featured broad criteria that are open to interpretation and subject to recruiter bias. Only 4.3% (3/70) protocols mentioned the provision of translation services. Conclusion Most UK CVD trial protocols feature eligibility criteria that potentially exclude EM groups. Trial eligibility criteria must be situated within a larger inclusive recruitment framework, where ethnicity is considered alongside other intersecting and disadvantaging identities.
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?