Abstract:Experimental measurements and numerical simulations of turbulent flows are characterized by a tradeoff between accuracy and resolution. In this study, we combine accurate sparse pointwise mean velocity measurements with the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations using data assimilation methods. Importantly, we bridge the gap between data assimilation (DA) using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and variational methods based on classical spatial discretization of the flow equations, by comparing both approaches on the same turbulent flow case. First, by constraining the PINN with sparse data and the underdetermined RANS equations without closure, we show that the mean flow is reconstructed to a higher accuracy than a RANS solver using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model. Second, we propose the SA turbulence model augmented PINN (PINN-DA-SA), which outperforms the former approach by up to 73% reduction in mean velocity reconstruction error with coarse measurements. The additional SA physics constraints improve flow reconstructions in regions with high velocity and pressure gradients and separation. Third, we compare the PINN-DA-SA approach to a variational data assimilation using the same sparse velocity measurements and physics constraints. The PINN-DA-SA achieves lower reconstruction error across a range of data resolutions. This is attributed to discretization errors in the variational methodology that are avoided by PINNs. We demonstrate the method using high-fidelity measurements from direct numerical simulation of the turbulent periodic hill at Re=5600 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.034605 Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Published by the American Physical Society

Learning unknown physics of non-Newtonian fluids

nn-PINNs: Non-Newtonian physics-informed neural networks for complex fluid modeling

Learning of viscosity functions in rarefied gas flows with physics-informed neural networks

Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Adaptive Localized Artificial Viscosity

An artificial viscosity augmented physics-informed neural network for incompressible flow

Solution multiplicity and effects of data and eddy viscosity on Navier-Stokes solutions inferred by physics-informed neural networks

Physics-Informed Deep Learning For Incompressible Laminar Flows

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review

Applying Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Solve Navier–Stokes Equations for Laminar Flow around a Particle

Multi-Viscosity Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Generating Ultra High Resolution Flow Field Data

Error estimates and physics informed augmentation of neural networks for thermally coupled incompressible Navier Stokes equations

Learning solutions of parametric Navier-Stokes with physics-informed neural networks

Turbulence model augmented physics-informed neural networks for mean-flow reconstruction

Learning rheological parameters of non-Newtonian fluids from velocimetry data

Deep learning based on mixed-variable physics informed neural network for solving fluid dynamics without simulation data

Hammering at the entropy: A GENERIC-guided approach to learning polymeric rheological constitutive equations using PINNs

Assimilating experimental data of a mean three-dimensional separated flow using physics-informed neural networks

RANS-PINN based Simulation Surrogates for Predicting Turbulent Flows

A General Physics-Informed Neural Network Approach for Deriving Fluid Flow Fields from Temperature Distribution