Extraction of high inverted mesiodentes via the labial, palatal and subperiostal intranasal approach:A clinical prospective study

Huifei Li,Yongfeng Cheng,Jun Lu,Pengfei Zhang,Yi Ning,Lei Xue,Yuan Zhang,Jie Wang,Yujia Hao,Xing Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2023.04.008
2023-07-21
Abstract:The aim of this study is to provide reliable support for the choice of extraction of high inverted mesiodens, and minimize the operation injury for patients. The operation statistics, life quality of postoperative patients, and the operative injury/recovery were compared and analyzed. The laser Doppler blood flowmetry, laser speckle contrast imaging, and electric pulp testing were explored to detect the postoperative pulp and gingiva blood supply of adjacent teeth. For the clinician's primary concerns, the surgical time, the volume of osteotomy, and the amount of bleeding in the labial approach group (The p values are 0.0001, <0.0001, and 0.0131, respectively.) and intranasal approach group (All p values were <0.0001.) were significantly less than that in the palatal approach group. However, from the patient's perspective, the postoperative swelling in the labial approach was far more than that in the intranasal approach group (p = 0.0044), with unsurprisingly lower satisfaction (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in pulp and gingival blood supply of adjacent teeth and jaw development. Trauma was manageable in all patients. Under the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, the extraction of mesiodens by the intranasal approach achieved a delicate balance between reducing surgical trauma and optimizing postoperative recovery, which was of concern and merited further study.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?