Abstract:Background PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy had been shown to be an effective first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there was no robust evidence showing a PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy benefited patients with squamous and non-squamous NSCLC. GEMSTONE-302 aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a PD-L1 inhibitor, sugemalimab, plus chemotherapy for patients with metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC. Methods This randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial was done in 35 hospitals and academic research centres in China. Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years, had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV squamous or non-squamous NSCLC without known EGFR sensitising mutations, ALK, ROS1, or RET fusions, no previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive sugemalimab (1200 mg, intravenously, every 3 weeks) plus platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) S mg/mL per min, intravenously] and paclitaxel [175 mg/m(2), intravenously] for squamous NSCLC, or carboplatin [AUC S mg/mL per min, intravenously] and pemetrexed [500 mg/m(2), intravenously] for non-squamous NSCLC; sugemalimab group) or placebo plus the same platinum-based chemotherapy regimens for squamous or non-squamous NSCLC as in the sugemalimab group; placebo group) for up to four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with sugemalimab or placebo for squamous NSCLC, and intravenous sugemalimab 500 mg/m(2) or matching placebo plus pemetrexed for non-squamous NSCLC. Randomisation was done by an interactive voice-web-response system via permuted blocks (block size was a mixture of three and six with a random order within each stratum) and stratified by ECOG performance status, PD-L1 expression, and tumour pathology. The investigators, patients, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one treatment dose. Results reported are from a prespecified interim analysis (ie, when the study met the primary endpoint) and an updated analysis (prespecified final analysis for progression-free survival) with a longer follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03789604), is closed to new participants, and follow-up is ongoing. Findings Between Dec 13, 2018, and May 15, 2020, 846 patients were assessed for eligibility; 367 were ineligible, and the remaining 479 patients were randomly assigned to the sugemalimab group (n=320) or placebo group (n=159). At the preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff June 8, 2020; median follow-up 8.6 months [IQR 6.1-11.4]), GEMSTONE-302 met its primary endpoint, with significantly longer progression-free survival in the sugemalimab group compared with the placebo group (median 7.8 months [95% CI 6.9-9.0] vs 4.9 months [4.7-5.0]; stratified hazard ratio [Hit] 0.50 [95% CI 0.39-0.64], p<0.0001]). At the final analysis (March 15, 2021) with a median follow-up of 17.8 months (IQR 15.1-20.9), the improvement in progression-free survival was maintained (median 9.0 months [95% CI 7.4-10.8] vs 4.9 months [4.8-5.1]; stratified HR 0.48 [95% CI 0.39-0.60], p<0.0001). The most common grade 3 or 4 any treatment-related adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (104 p3%1 of 320 with sugemalimab vs 52 [33%] of 159 with placebo), white blood cell count decreased (45 [14%] vs 27 117%1), anaemia (43 113%1 vs 18 [11%]), platelet count decreased (33 [10%] vs 15 [9%]), and neutropenia (12 [4%] vs seven [4%]). Any treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 73 (23%) patients in the sugemalimab group and 31 (20%) patients in the placebo group. Any treatment-related deaths were reported in ten (3%) patients in the sugemalimab group (pneumonia with respiratory failure in one patient; myelosuppression with septic shock in one patient; pneumonia in two patients; respiratory failure, abdominal pain, cardiac failure, and immune-mediated pneumonitis in one patient each; the other two deaths had an unspecified cause) and in two (1%) patients in the placebo group (pneumonia and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome). Interpretation Sugernalimab plus chemotherapy showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival improvement compared with placebo plus chemotherapy, in patients with previously untreated squamous and non-squamous metastatic NSCLC, regardless of PD-Li expression, and could be a new first-line treatment option for both squamous and non-squamous metastatic NSCLC. Copyright (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Subgroup analysis in patients (pts) with non-squamous (N-Sq), EGFR-wild type (wt), second/third-line NSCLC from the global phase (Ph) 3 trial DUBLIN-3 (BPI-2358-103) with the plinabulin/docetaxel (Plin/Doc) combination versus Doc alone.

P17.02 RATIONALE 307: A Subgroup Analysis of Tislelizumab Plus Chemo Vs Chemo Alone As 1L Treatment for Stage IIIB Advanced Sq NSCLC

Plinabulin plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based regimen (DUBLIN-3): a phase 3, international, multicentre, single-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial

Abstract CT041: ORIENT-3: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Sintilimab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Advanced/metastatic Squamous Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (Sqnsclc)

Phase I/II trial of plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Big ten cancer research consortium (BTCRC-LUN17-127) study

Phase Ib Study of Sintilimab in Combination with Chemotherapy for 1L Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

1263P Tislelizumab + Chemotherapy Vs Chemotherapy Alone As First-Line Treatment for Locally Advanced/metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC

Abstract CT114: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in a Predominantly Chinese Patient Population with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results of the Phase 3 CheckMate 078 Study

LBA56 ORIENT-12: Sintilimab Plus Gemcitabine and Platinum (GP) As First-Line (1L) Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (Sqnsclc)

Randomized Phase Iii Study Of Recombinant Human Apo-2 Ligand (Apo-2 Ligand) Plus Vinorelbine/Cisplatin (Np) Verus Placebo Plus Np In Patients With Stage Iiib/Iv Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc): A Single Center Report.

Platinum-based Chemotherapy (chemo) with CS1001, an Anti-Pd-l1 Antibody, for First-Line Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Preliminary Results from Phase Ib Cohorts of CS1001-101 Study.

86P Efficacy and Safety of IBI110 (Anti-Lag-3 Mab) in Combination with Sintilimab (Anti-Pd-1 Mab) in Advanced Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (sqnsclc): Updated Results of the Phase Ib Study

Sugemalimab Versus Placebo, in Combination with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy, As First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer (GEMSTONE-302): Interim and Final Analyses of a Double-Blind, Randomised, Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

A phase III comparative study of nivolumab (anti-PD-1; BMS-936558; ONO-4538) versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Phase III study of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq NSCLC).

KEYNOTE-033: Randomized phase 3 study of pembrolizumab vs docetaxel in previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced NSCLC

LBA4 GEMSTONE-302: A Phase III Study of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (chemo) with Placebo or CS1001, an Anti-Pdl1 Antibody, for First-Line (1L) Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Phase III, randomized trial (CheckMate 057) of nivolumab (NIVO) versus docetaxel (DOC) in advanced non-squamous cell (non-SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Anlotinib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated results from a phase I/II study.

Abstract CT249: Results from KEYMAKER-U01 substudy 3: a phase 2 umbrella study of pembrolizumab plus investigational agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy

Nedaplatin Plus Docetaxel Versus Cisplatin Plus Docetaxel As First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung - A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial.