Abstract:Background and objectives: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most serious complications after laparoscopic anus-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, which significantly prolongs the patient's hospital stay, leads to dysfunction, and even increases the patient's perioperative morbidity and mortality, and little is known about the effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures to prevent AL. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of anastomotic reinforcement sutures as a means to prevent AL during laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods: A comprehensive and systematic search was performed in the literature database by combining subject and free terms up to 10 October 2023. The overall literature included was integrated and analyzed using Stata 12.0 software and Review Manager version 5.4 software to assess the effect of anastomotic reinforcement sutures on the incidence of AL. Results: A total of 2,452 patients from 14 studies were included, and an integrated analysis showed that the use of anastomotic reinforcement sutures significantly reduced the incidence of AL [odds ratio (OR) = 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18–0.37; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%]. However, the findings confirmed whether or not the anastomosis reinforced with sutures did not affect the incidence of anastomotic stenosis (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.37–1.32; P = 0.27; I 2 = 0%). We performed subgroup analyses of the results of the study, the randomized controlled studies (OR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15–0.65; P < 0.001) as well as retrospective studies (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19–0.41; P < 0.001), 3–0 sutures (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.17–0.45; P < 0.001) versus 4–0 sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13–0.53; P < 0.001), barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.48; P < 0.001) versus non-barbed wire sutures (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001), interrupted (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20–0.46; P < 0.001) versus continuous sutures (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) to the anastomosis, full-thickness suture (OR = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16–0.51; P < 0.001) versus sutured with the seromuscular layer (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001), anastomotic sutured in one (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.53; P < 0.001) versus non-one circle (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.44; P < 0.001), and reinforcing sutures to the dog-ear area (OR = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14–0.50; P < 0.001) versus the non–dog-ear area (OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.20–0.45; P < 0.001), which have suggested that there is no significant difference between each other and that all of them reduce the incidence of AL. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that performing reinforcement suturing of the anastomosis during laparoscopic rectal surgery significantly lowers the incidence of postoperative AL but has no significant effect on anastomotic stenosis. It is important to note that further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm this conclusion. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022368631.

“Dog ear” formation after double-stapled low anterior resection as a risk factor for anastomotic disruption

Double-stapled anastomosis without “dog-ears” reduces the anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled study

Single‐stapled colorectal anastomotic techniques: Do not cross the line

Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection And Eversion Technique Combined With A Nondog Ear Anastomosis For Mid- And Distal Rectal Neoplasms A Preliminary And Feasibility Study

Effectiveness of anastomotic reinforcement sutures in reducing anastomotic leakage risk after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a pooled and integration analysis

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with “dog ear” invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis

Effect of Different Reinforcement Methods on Anastomotic Leakage Prevention after Laparoscopic Double Anastomosis.

Effect of intraoperative anastomotic reinforcement suture on the prevention of anastomotic leakage of double-stapling anastomosis for laparoscopic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pilot Study on Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Stapled Gastroesophageal Anastomosis

Association between circular stapler size and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Suspension and Suturing Technique Can Reduce the Incidence of Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Excision: a Single, Prospective, Cohort Study

The impact of stapled compared to handsewn repair on anastomotic outcomes in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors

Buttressing of the Staple Line in Gastrointestinal Anastomoses: Overview of New Technology Designed to Reduce Perioperative Complications

Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses after bowel resection in patients with crohn disease

Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation

Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Stapled Antimesenteric Functional End-to-End Anastomosis Following Intestinal Resection for Crohn’s Disease

The mesenteric entry site as a potential weak point in gastrointestinal anastomoses – findings from an ex-vivo biomechanical analysis

Comparison of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine in dogs

Quality of stapled mesenteric defect closure influences the chance of reopening after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery