Abstract:AIM To investigate the simplicity, reliability, and safety of the application of single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy completed by the same surgical group between January 2011 and April 2014 in the General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army. In total, 51 cases received single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis and 51 cases received double-layer pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. The diagnoses of pancreatic fistula and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy were judged strictly by the International Study Group on pancreatic fistula definition. The preoperative and intraoperative data of these two groups were compared. χ(2) test and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze the incidences of pancreatic fistula, peritoneal catheterization, abdominal infection and overall complications between the single-layer anastomosis group and double-layer anastomosis group. Rank sum test were used to analyze the difference in operation time, pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time, postoperative hospitalization time, total hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses between the single-layer anastomosis group and double-layer anastomosis group. RESULTS Patients with grade A pancreatic fistula accounted for 15.69% (8/51) vs 15.69% (8/51) (P = 1.0000), and patients with grades B and C pancreatic fistula accounted for 9.80% (5/51) vs 52.94% (27/51) (P = 0.0000) in the single-layer and double-layer anastomosis groups. Although there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients with grade A pancreatic fistula, there was a significant difference in the percentage of patients with grades B and C pancreatic fistula between the two groups. The operation time (220.059 ± 60.602 min vs 379.412 ± 90.761 min, P = 0.000), pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time (17.922 ± 5.145 min vs 31.333 ± 7.776 min, P = 0.000), postoperative hospitalization time (18.588 ± 5.285 d vs 26.373 ± 15.815 d, P = 0.003), total hospitalization time (25.627 ± 6.551 d vs 33.706 ± 15.899 d, P = 0.002), hospitalization expenses (116787.667 ± 31900.927 yuan vs 162788.608 ± 129732.500 yuan, P = 0.001), as well as the incidences of pancreatic fistula [13/51 (25.49%) vs 35/51 (68.63%), P = 0.0000], peritoneal catheterization [0/51 (0%) vs 6/51 (11.76%), P = 0.0354], abdominal infection [1/51 (1.96%) vs 11/51 (21.57%), P = 0.0021], and overall complications [21/51 (41.18%) vs 37/51 (72.55%), P = 0.0014] in the single-layer anastomosis group were all lower than those in the double-layer anastomosis group. CONCLUSION Single-layer mucosa-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunal anastomosis appears to be a simple, reliable, and safe method. Use of this method could reduce the postoperative incidence of complications.

Comparison of single-layer anastomosis and double-layer anastomosis of small intestine in dogs

Clinical Analysis of 9 Cases of a Novel Stent Assisted Intestinal Bypass for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

Sutureless Choledochoduodenostomy with an Intraluminal Degradable Stent in Dog Model.

Comparison of postoperative healing and adhesion for two kinds of intestinal anastomosis

Experimental Study of Primary Repair of Colonic Leakage with a Degradable Stent in a Porcine Model

Experiment study of single-layer anastomosis in clinical

A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis

Single Layered Intestinal Anastomosis: A Safe and Economic Technique

Asymmetric figure-of-eight single-layer suture technique for intestinal anastomosis: A preliminary study

Clinical Application and Experimental Study of Layered Anastomosis in Esophagogastrostomy

An observational comparative study of single layer continuous extramucosal anastomosis versus conventional double layer intestinal anastomosis

An alternative asymmetric figure-of-eight single-layer suture technique for bowel anastomosis in an in vitro porcine model

A novel method for multiple bowel injuries: a pilot canine experiment

Experimental Studies on Seromuscular Layer Anastomosis of Gastrointestinal Tract in Rabbits

Application of Single-Layer Mucosa-to-mucosa Pancreaticojejunal Anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy

A Sutureless Method for Digestive Tract Reconstruction During Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Dog Model.

Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of five intestinal anastomosis techniques in cats

ANALYSIS AND ADVANTAGES OF SINGLE LAYER VS DOUBLE LAYER INTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS IN EMERGENCY SETTINGS IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE – A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

The experimental study on the healing quality of the stoma in esophagogastrostomy by layering anastomosis

Curative Effect Comparison between Single Stapling Double Pouch Suturing and Double Stapling for Colorectal Anastomosis in the Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancers

Ex vivo comparison of one-layer versus two-layer closures in end-to-end anastomoses in normal equine descending colon