Abstract:Project portfolio selection (PPS) is one of the most important basic problems in the field of project management.PPS is to select a subset of projects from candidates subject to resource capacity and some other constraints to realize one or more goals.By integrating some features,such as project interactions,parameter uncertainty and multiple objectives.The PSS is more complex and difficult to be solved.In practice,project interaction is influenced by many factors among which the relationships are uncertain and complicated.Consequently,the project interaction is usually with severer uncertainty and its probability distribution is difficult to estimate.Therefore,in this paper,the PSS problem with uncertain project interaction is investigated.At first,without considering uncertainty,the programming model is formulated to maximize the total profits for the PSS with two types of project interactions including profit interaction and resource consumption interaction.Then,the uncertainty of project interactions is taken into consideration.The uncertainty is defined as an interval with nominal value and the half-interval width.Two controller parameters called objective robustness level and constraint robustness level are also defined,which vary in the interval [0,1].The objective robustness level and constraint robustness level control the robustness of objective function and constraints against the level of conservatism respectively.Based on the definitions of uncertainty as well as robustness level,the general robust optimization model is formulated.To solve the model,its robust counter part as a linear mix integer programming is derived on the basis of optimization theory.A case of R&D project portfolio selection is illustrated and numerous experiments are conducted to investigate the relationship among two robustness levels and the objective.Experiments show that the method can adjust the robustness of solutions,and thus can provide project managers who have different risk preferences with decision support.

Analysing Organisational Robustness In The Application Of Project Portfolio Management

Towards a comprehensive framework for risk assessment of organizational development project portfolios

Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success

Developing strategies to improve agility in the project procurement management (PPM) process

Improving Organisational Process Input Factors and Company Performance

Assessment of Project Management Maturity Models Strengths and Weaknesses

Project Management Maturity And Its Impact On Perceived Project Success A Case Study

Robust Decision-Making of Project Portfolio Selectionwith Uncertain Project Interactions

The Relationship Between Pmo Support Functions And Project Management Maturity Levels A Case Study Of A South African Petrochemical Company

Project management maturity: an assessment of project management capabilities among and between selected industries

Organizational flexibility and project portfolio performance: the roles of innovation, absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism

Role of Organizational Project Management Maturity Factors on Project Success

Scenario-based optimization robust model project portfolio selection under risk considerations

The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?

Increasing Project Success in China from the Perspectives of Project Risk, Methodology, Tool Use, and Organizational Support

Assessing project criticality in project portfolio: a vulnerability modeling approach

A novel project portfolio selection framework towards organizational resilience: Robust Ordinal Priority Approach

A Robust Human–Machine Framework for Project Portfolio Selection

Strengthening Success Factors and Overcoming Profitability Barriers towards Sustainable Project Management Consultant Companies

Industrial R&D project portfolio selection method using a multi-objective optimization program: A conceptual quantitative framework

Something Old, Something New?: Competing Logics and the Hybrid Nature of New Corporate Professions