Abstract:Many networks in political and social research are bipartite, with edges connecting exclusively across two distinct types of nodes. A common example includes cosponsorship networks, in which legislators are connected indirectly through the bills they support. Yet most existing network models are designed for unipartite networks, where edges can arise between any pair of nodes. However, using a unipartite network model to analyze bipartite networks, as often done in practice, can result in aggregation bias and artificially high-clustering -- a particularly insidious problem when studying the role groups play in network formation. To address these methodological problems, we develop a statistical model of bipartite networks theorized to be generated through group interactions by extending the popular mixed-membership stochastic blockmodel. Our model allows researchers to identify the groups of nodes, within each node type in the bipartite structure, that share common patterns of edge formation. The model also incorporates both node and dyad-level covariates as the predictors of group membership and of observed dyadic relations. We develop an efficient computational algorithm for fitting the model, and apply it to cosponsorship data from the United States Senate. We show that legislators in a Senate that was perfectly split along party lines were able to remain productive and pass major legislation by forming non-partisan, power-brokering coalitions that found common ground through their collaboration on low-stakes bills. We also find evidence for norms of reciprocity, and uncover the substantial role played by policy expertise in the formation of cosponsorships between senators and legislation. We make an open-source software package available that makes it possible for other researchers to uncover similar insights from bipartite networks.

Identifying opinion-based groups from survey data: a bipartite network approach

Attitude networks as intergroup realities: Using network-modelling to research attitude-identity relationships in polarized political contexts

Look Who's Talking: Bipartite Networks as Representations of a Topic Model of New Zealand Parliamentary Speeches

A Statistical Model of Bipartite Networks: Application to Cosponsorship in the United States Senate

Finding polarised communities and tracking information diffusion on Twitter: The Irish Abortion Referendum

Targeted Bipartite Consensus of Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks with Credibility Intervals.

Quantifying Multipolar Polarization

Statistical Inference in Political Networks Research

The likes that bind: Even novel opinion sharing can induce opinion‐based identification

Organization of networks with tagged nodes and biased links: a priori distinct communities. The case of Intelligent Design Proponents and Darwinian Evolution Defenders

Opinion disparity in hypergraphs with community structure

Network analysis approach to Likert-style surveys

Reputations for treatment of outgroup members can prevent the emergence of political segregation in cooperative networks

Hypothesis Testing for Group Structure in Legislative Networks

Quantifying discrepancies in opinion spectra from online and offline networks

Exploiting Social Network Structure for Person-to-Person Sentiment Analysis

Consensus, Bi-polarization and Multiformity in Opinion Dynamics with Bidirectional Thresholds

Latent geometry of bipartite networks

Confidence sets for network structure

Disunited Nations? A Multiplex Network Approach to Detecting Preference Affinity Blocs using Texts and Votes

An Influence Network Model to Study Discrepancies in Expressed and Private Opinions