Abstract:The increasing use of digital learning tools and platforms in formal and informal learning settings has provided broad access to large amounts of learner data, the analysis of which has been aimed at understanding students' learning processes, improving learning outcomes, providing learner support as well as teaching. Presently, such data has been largely accessed from discussion forums in online learning management systems and has been further analyzed through the application of social network analysis (SNA). Nevertheless, the results of these analyses have not always been reproducible. Since such learning analytics (LA) methods rely on measurement as a first step of the process, the robustness of selected techniques for measuring collaborative learning activities is critical for the transparency, reproducibility and generalizability of the results. This paper presents findings from a study focusing on the validation of critical centrality measures frequently used in the fields of LA and SNA research. We examined how different network configurations (i.e., multigraph, weighted, and simplified) influence the reproducibility and robustness of centrality measures as indicators of student learning in CSCL settings. In particular, this research aims to contribute to the provision of robust and valid methods for measuring and better understanding of the participation and social dimensions of collaborative learning. The study was conducted based on a dataset of 12 university courses. The results show that multigraph configuration produces the most consistent and robust centrality measures. The findings also show that degree centralities calculated with the multigraph methods are reliable indicators for students' participatory efforts as well as a consistent predictor of their performance. Similarly, Eigenvector centrality was the most consistent centrality that reliably represented social dimension, regardless of the network configuration. This study offers guidance on the appropriate network representation as well as sound recommendations about how to reliably select the appropriate metrics for each dimension.

Network analysis approach to Likert-style surveys

Network analysis of graduate program support structures through experiences of various demographic groups

Network analysis: a brief overview and tutorial

How Social Networks Influence Human Behavior: An Integrated Latent Space Approach for Differential Social Influence

Likert Scale in Social Sciences Research: Problems and Difficulties

Applying the Network Item Response Model to Student Assessment Data

A Survey on Studying the Social Networks of Students

Simple Surveys: Response Retrieval Inspired by Recommendation Systems

A scalable online tool for quantitative social network assessment reveals potentially modifiable social environmental risks

A Novel, Network-Based Approach to Assessing Romantic-Relationship Quality

Combining surveys and sensors to explore student behaviour

The Study of Psychopathology from the Network Analysis Perspective: A Systematic Review

An introduction to network analysis for studies of medication use

A Novel Neutrosophic Likert Scale Analysis of Perceptions of Organizational Distributive Justice via a Score Function: A Complete Statistical Study and Symmetry Evidence Using Real-Life Survey Data

A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods Applied to a Likert Scale

Capturing the participation and social dimensions of computer-supported collaborative learning through social network analysis: which method and measures matter?

Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models

Indeterminate Likert scale: feedback based on neutrosophy, its distance measures and clustering algorithm

Lack of consistency in measurement methods and semantics used for network measures in adolescent health behaviour studies using social network analysis: a systematic review

Using network analysis to explore the validity and influential items of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39