Hypereosinophilia In A Complex Post Transplant Pediatric Patient

C. Maddukuri,J. McDonnell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.702
2024-10-28
Abstract:Introduction This case of recurrent hypereosinophilia in a complex post-transplant pediatric patient illustrates the need for a comprehensive multidisciplinary workup to rule out possible etiologies. It offers guidance on relevant history-taking skills and different laboratory/diagnostic tests and procedures to work up hypereosinophilia while highlighting important treatment avenues. Case Description 6-year-old male with history of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1, autoimmune hepatitis complicated by fulminant hepatic failure s/p liver transplantation in November 2019 (initial immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, prednisolone/prednisone), and solitary kidney follows with Immunology for chronic eosinophilia (present since 2020). Multiple attempts to wean systemic steroids due to concerns of failure to thrive/growth stunting have been complicated by subsequent rise in LFTs and eosinophils. Further complications include ongoing issues with EBV viremia from his EBV+ liver donor, which worsens with increased immunosuppression. A distinct pattern of hypereosinophilia in close association with demonstrated viral infections (influenza, rhino/enterovirus) has emerged. Discussion It is thought his hypereosinophilia (peak at 27k) is secondary to adrenal insufficiency in setting of chronic steroid use. Immunosuppressants have seemed to interact with intercurrent viral infections and underlying EBV viremia, leading to Th1/Th2 imbalances and resultant hypereosinophilia. Potential medication triggers, parasitic infections, and Addisonian effect secondary to AIRE mutations have been ruled out. Bone marrow biopsy, PET scan, and advanced testing (immunophenotyping to look for lymphocytic HES, FIP1L1/PDGFR testing) have all been negative, suggesting a lack of clonality to his eosinophilia. Future treatment options include a clinical trial of Mepolizumab versus changing immunosuppression to sirolimus given its pro regulatory T cell effect.
immunology,allergy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?