Abstract:Background: Early diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) can be curative; however, prostate-specific antigen is a suboptimal screening test for clinically significant PCa. While prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated value for the diagnosis of PCa, the acquisition time is too long for a first-line screening modality. Purpose: To accelerate prostate MRI exams, utilizing a variational network (VN) for image reconstruction. Study type: Retrospective. Subjects: One hundred and thirteen subjects (train/val/test: 70/13/30) undergoing prostate MRI. Field strength/sequence: 3.0 T; a T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) T2-weighted image (T2WI) sequence in axial and coronal planes, and axial echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Assessment: Four abdominal radiologists evaluated the image quality of VN reconstructions of retrospectively under-sampled biparametric MRIs (bp-MRI), and standard bp-MRI reconstructions for 20 test subjects (studies). The studies included axial and coronal T2WI, DWI B50 seconds/mm2 and B1000 seconds/mm (4-fold T2WI, 3-fold DWI), all of which were evaluated separately for image quality on a Likert scale (1: non-diagnostic to 5: excellent quality). In another 10 test subjects, three readers graded lesions on bp-MRI-which additionally included calculated B1500 seconds/mm2 , and apparent diffusion coefficient map-according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1), for both VN and standard reconstructions. Accuracy of PI-RADS ≥3 for clinically significant cancer was computed. Projected scan time of the retrospectively under-sampled biparametric exam was also computed. Statistical tests: One-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for comparison of image quality. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for lesion detection and grading. Generalized estimating equation with cluster effect was used to compare differences between standard and VN bp-MRI. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Three of four readers rated no significant difference for overall quality between the standard and VN axial T2WI (Reader 1: 4.00 ± 0.56 (Standard), 3.90 ± 0.64 (VN) P = 0.33; Reader 2: 4.35 ± 0.74 (Standard), 3.80 ± 0.89 (VN) P = 0.003; Reader 3: 4.60 ± 0.50 (Standard), 4.55 ± 0.60 (VN) P = 0.39; Reader 4: 3.65 ± 0.99 (Standard), 3.60 ± 1.00 (VN) P = 0.38). All four readers rated no significant difference for overall quality between standard and VN DWI B1000 seconds/mm2 (Reader 1: 2.25 ± 0.62 (Standard), 2.45 ± 0.75 (VN) P = 0.96; Reader 2: 3.60 ± 0.92 (Standard), 3.55 ± 0.82 (VN) P = 0.40; Reader 3: 3.85 ± 0.72 (Standard), 3.55 ± 0.89 (VN) P = 0.07; Reader 4: 4.70 ± 0.76 (Standard); 4.60 ± 0.73 (VN) P = 0.17) and three of four readers rated no significant difference for overall quality between standard and VN DWI B50 seconds/mm2 (Reader 1: 3.20 ± 0.70 (Standard), 3.40 ± 0.75 (VN) P = 0.98; Reader 2: 2.85 ± 0.81 (Standard), 3.00 ± 0.79 (VN) P = 0.93; Reader 3: 4.45 ± 0.72 (Standard), 4.05 ± 0.69 (VN) P = 0.02; Reader 4: 4.50 ± 0.69 (Standard), 4.45 ± 0.76 (VN) P = 0.50). In the lesion evaluation study, there was no significant difference in the number of PI-RADS ≥3 lesions identified on standard vs. VN bp-MRI (P = 0.92, 0.59, 0.87) with similar sensitivity and specificity for clinically significant cancer. The average scan time of the standard clinical biparametric exam was 11.8 minutes, and this was projected to be 3.2 minutes for the accelerated exam. Data conclusion: Diagnostic accelerated biparametric prostate MRI exams can be performed using deep learning methods in <4 minutes, potentially enabling rapid screening prostate MRI. Level of evidence: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Assessing deep learning reconstruction for faster prostate MRI: visual vs. diagnostic performance metrics

Deep Learning for Under-Sampled Non-Cartesian ASL MRI Reconstruction

Comparison of model-based versus deep learning-based image reconstruction for thin-slice T2-weighted spin-echo prostate MRI

Diagnostic performance of deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography

End-to-End AI-based MRI Reconstruction and Lesion Detection Pipeline for Evaluation of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction

Application of deep learning reconstruction in abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for image quality improvement and acquisition time reduction

Using deep learning to optimize the prostate MRI protocol by assessing the diagnostic efficacy of MRI sequences

Impact of Emerging Deep Learning-Based MR Image Reconstruction Algorithms on Abdominal MRI Radiomic Features

Deep Learning Reconstruction Enables Highly Accelerated Biparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate

Deep learning-based reconstruction of highly accelerated 3D MRI

Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Cardiac MRI: A Review

Faster acquisition of magnetic resonance imaging sequences of the knee via deep learning reconstruction: A volunteer study

The object detection method aids in image reconstruction evaluation and clinical interpretation of meniscal abnormalities

2D-MRI of the Central Nervous System: The effect of a deep learning-based reconstruction pipeline on the overall image quality

Enhancing the image quality of prostate diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with prostate cancer through model-based deep learning reconstruction

Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI

Deep learning reconstruction for the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI: comparison with 3T MRI without deep learning reconstruction

Complexities of deep learning-based undersampled MR image reconstruction

Deep Learning for Accelerated and Robust MRI Reconstruction: a Review

A Systematic Review and Identification of the Challenges of Deep Learning Techniques for Undersampled Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction

Deep learning performance on MRI prostate gland segmentation: evaluation of two commercially available algorithms compared with an expert radiologist