Abstract:Background Assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis at MRI is repetitive and time consuming. Deep learning (DL) could improve -productivity and the consistency of reporting. Purpose To develop a DL model for automated detection and classification of lumbar central canal, lateral recess, and neural -foraminal stenosis. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, lumbar spine MRI scans obtained from September 2015 to September 2018 were included. Studies of patients with spinal instrumentation or studies with suboptimal image quality, as well as postgadolinium studies and studies of patients with scoliosis, were excluded. Axial T2-weighted and sagittal T1-weighted images were used. Studies were split into an internal training set (80%), validation set (9%), and test set (11%). Training data were labeled by four radiologists using predefined gradings (normal, mild, moderate, and severe). A two-component DL model was developed. First, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to detect the region of interest (ROI), with a second CNN for classification. An internal test set was labeled by a musculoskeletal radiologist with 31 years of experience (reference standard) and two subspecialist radiologists (radiologist 1: A.M., 5 years of experience; radiologist 2: J.T.P.D.H., 9 years of experience). DL model performance on an external test set was evaluated. Detection recall (in percentage), interrater agreement (Gwet κ), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Results Overall, 446 MRI lumbar spine studies were analyzed (446 patients; mean age ± standard deviation, 52 years ± 19; 240 women), with 396 patients in the training (80%) and validation (9%) sets and 50 (11%) in the internal test set. For internal testing, DL model and radiologist central canal recall were greater than 99%, with reduced neural foramina recall for the DL model (84.5%) and radiologist 1 (83.9%) compared with radiologist 2 (97.1%) ( < .001). For internal testing, dichotomous classification (normal or mild vs moderate or severe) showed almost-perfect agreement for both radiologists and the DL model, with respective κ values of 0.98, 0.98, and 0.96 for the central canal; 0.92, 0.95, and 0.92 for lateral recesses; and 0.94, 0.95, and 0.89 for neural foramina ( < .001). External testing with 100 MRI scans of lumbar spines showed almost perfect agreement for the DL model for dichotomous classification of all ROIs (κ, 0.95-0.96; < .001). Conclusion A deep learning model showed comparable agreement with subspecialist radiologists for detection and classification of central canal and lateral recess stenosis, with slightly lower agreement for neural foraminal stenosis at lumbar spine MRI. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Hayashi in this issue.

Deep learning reconstruction for the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI: comparison with 3T MRI without deep learning reconstruction

Deep Learning for Under-Sampled Non-Cartesian ASL MRI Reconstruction

Super-resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction Cervical Spine 1.5T MRI: Improved Interobserver Agreement in Evaluations of Neuroforaminal Stenosis Compared to Conventional Deep Learning Reconstruction

Applicability of deep learning-based reconstruction trained by brain and knee 3T MRI to lumbar 1.5T MRI

Evaluation of deep learning reconstructed high-resolution 3D lumbar spine MRI

Assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy for cervical spondylosis using T2w-STIR sequence with a deep learning-based reconstruction approach

Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study

Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI

Faster acquisition of magnetic resonance imaging sequences of the knee via deep learning reconstruction: A volunteer study

Super-resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for 3D Brain MR Imaging: Improvement of Cranial Nerve Depiction and Interobserver Agreement in Evaluations of Neurovascular Conflict

Comparative analysis of image quality and interchangeability between standard and deep learning-reconstructed T2-weighted spine MRI

Application of deep learning reconstruction in abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for image quality improvement and acquisition time reduction

Deep learning reconstruction for high-resolution computed tomography images of the temporal bone: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction

Diagnostic performance of deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm in 3D MR neurography

Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal, Lateral Recess, and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Lumbar Spine MRI

Deep learning reconstruction for lumbar spine MRI acceleration: a prospective study

Deep learning-based reconstruction of highly accelerated 3D MRI

Effect of deep learning-based reconstruction on high-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast asymmetric spin-echo imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cerebellopontine angle tumors

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction approach for enhanced visualization in lumbar spine MR bone imaging

Deep Learning Model for Automated Detection and Classification of Central Canal and Neural Foraminal Stenosis at Cervical Spine MRI

Assessing deep learning reconstruction for faster prostate MRI: visual vs. diagnostic performance metrics