Abstract:Delayed polypectomy bleeding (DPB) is the most common adverse event following endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps. The role of prophylactic clipping to prevent DBP after endoscopic resection of large polyps remains controversial. The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic clipping in prevention of DPB following endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps by synthesizing the results of randomized controlled trials. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE through September 2019 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of prophylactic clipping for preventing DPB after resection of colorectal polyps. The primary end point was DPB defined by gastrointestinal bleeding occurring after the conclusion of the colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis stratified by predictors of DPB was performed. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool and pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 statistic. Nine published trials including 3,995 patients met the inclusion criteria. All studies had low risk of bias. The pooled incidence of DPB was lower in clipping (1.7% vs 2.6%, RR=0.63, 95%CI 0.45-0.87, P=0.006; I2=39.2%) compared to no clipping group (Figure 1) with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 111. In the subgroup analysis, clipping was associated with reduced risk of DPB compared to no clipping in patients with lesions ≥2cm (4.0% vs.7.7%; RR=0.51, 95%CI 0.32-0.82, P=0.006; I2=0.0%, NNT=27) (Figure 2A) and sessile/flat polyps (2.4% vs. 4.5%; RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.35-0.84, P=0.006; I2=0.0%, NNT=48) (Figure 2B). No effect of clipping on risk of DPB were observed when the patients were stratified by polyp location (proximal vs. distal) or anticoagulation use. Placement of prophylactic clips following endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps demonstrated a modest reduction in the risk of DPB. A larger protective effect of prophylactic clips was observed in patients with polyps size ≥2cm or those with sessile/flat polyps.Figure 2(A) Clipping vs. No Clipping for Polyps >2cm on Delayed Polypectomy Bleeding (B) Clipping vs. No Clipping for Sessile or Flat Polyps on Delayed Polypectomy BleedingView Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

S379 Endoscopist Aggregated Hot Snare Polypectomy Rate is Associated With Increased Risk of Colonoscopy Adverse Events

Risk Factors for Incomplete Polyp Resection During Colonoscopy

Mo1721 PROPHYLACTIC CLIPS REDUCE THE RISK OF DELAYED POLYPECTOMY BLEEDING FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps

Risk Factors Related to Polyp Miss Rate of Short-Term Repeated Colonoscopy

Bleeding Risk of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Measuring 10 mm or Less: Subgroup Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cold snare polypectomy reduced delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with conventional hot polypectomy: a propensity score-matching analysis

Endoscopist adenomas-per-colonoscopy detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Cold Snare Versus Hot Snare in Treatment for 10–19 Mm Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Protocol of a Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Study

A30 RECURRENCE RATES AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION OF LARGE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis

Risk factors for polyp retrieval failure in colonoscopy

Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy

Sedated Colonoscopy may not be Beneficial for Polyp/Adenoma Detection

CEG_A_285573 19..25

Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy

An international polypectomy practice survey

Characteristics of Patients with Post-Colonoscopy Unplanned Hospital Visit: A Retrospective Single-Center Observational Study