Abstract:Purpose This paper investigates whether the audit fees of Chinese listed firms are associated with the share pledging practice of the firm’s controlling shareholders. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the audit pricing model to estimate the association between the share pledging of listed firms and audit fees. Cross-sectional analysis is conducted on a large sample of Chinese listed firms during the period 2004 to 2019. The authors further test the moderating effects of listing on the Main Board, state ownership and abnormal audit report lag on the association between share pledging and audit fees. The results remain robust to various endogeneity tests including two-stage least squares instrumental variable analysis, entropy balancing analysis and difference-in-difference analysis. Findings The study finds that audit fees are positively associated with the proportion of shares pledged by the listed firm’s controlling shareholder in China. The results also provide new evidence that the positive association between audit fees and the share pledging of controlling shareholders could be mitigated if the firm is listed on the Main Board and/or it is a state-owned enterprise. In contrast, pledged firms with abnormal audit report lag are found to have higher audit fees than their pledged counterparts without the excessively long audit delay. Practical implications Findings of this study have important practical implications to those charged with governance, as boards need to comprehensively understand the adverse consequences of share pledging when pursuing it as the firm’s major source of financing. The study also has policy implications for stock market regulators such as the China Securities Regulatory Commission in China. Regulators could consider developing a threshold-based share pledging disclosure and pledge ratio requirements based on factors such as a firm’s listing status and ownership structure. Originality/value This study provides new evidence on the audit-related consequences of share pledging in a significant capital market. Findings of this study also enrich the existing audit literature by introducing the share pledging activities of controlling shareholders into the audit pricing decision-making model.

The impact of comment letters on audit fees: Evidence from spillover effect

The Spillover Effect of Customers' ESG to Suppliers

The Spillover Effects of Innovation Content Disclosure in MD&A

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Exploring the relationship between corporate ESG information disclosure and audit fees: evidence from non-financial A-share listed companies in China

The impact of ESG performance on audit fees - a study based on a two-way fixed effects model

Do auditors care about what retail investors say? Evidence from China

Positive Externality of Analyst Coverage Upon Audit Services: Evidence from China

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients

ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China

Abnormal Audit Fees and the Shredded Audit Quality:Evidence from China's Public Companies

Does the green credit policy improve audit fees? Evidence from Chinese firms

Abnormal Audit Fees, Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality

Do auditors respond when listed firms pledge shares? Evidence from China

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

The effect of environmental credit rating on audit fees: A quasi-natural experiment from China

Signing auditors’ foreign experience and audit pricing

Managerial myopia and audit fees: Evidence from China

Effects of carbon emissions on audit fees

Economic Policy Uncertainty, Corporate Risk-Taking and Abnormal Audit Fees