Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: an in Vitro Study.
Xin Yue Zhang,Yue Cao,Zhe Wen Hu,Yong Wang,Hu Chen,Yu Chun Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b3317959
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of 10 intraoral scanners for single-crown and three-unit preparation models.Methods: A maxillary partially edentulous model was fabricated. A dental cast scanner was used to obtain standard tessellation language (STL) data. Ten intraoral scanners, namely Trios 2 (TR2; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark), True Definition (TD; 3M, Saint Paul, MN, USA), CERECAC Omnicam (OM; Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA), Organical Scan Oral (OS; R+K, Berlin, Germany), PlanScan (PS; Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland), DWIOP (DW; Dental Wings, Montreal, Canada), Xianlin (XL; Hangzhou Xianlin, Hangzhou, China), DL-100 (DL; Guangzhou Longcheng, Guangzhou, China), Trios 3 (TR3; 3Shape) and i500 (MD; MEDIT, Seoul, South Korea) were used to obtain stereolithography data as test groups. Trueness, pre-cision and surface accuracy were evaluated by deviation analysis using 3D image processing software. One tooth with a three-unit preparation for each test group was registered with the reference scan data, and the absolute distance from another tooth was calculated as the abso-lute accuracy. The data were analysed using a Mann-Whitney U test and Dunn-Bonferroni test (cc = 0.05).Results: The best trueness, precision and surface accuracy of scanning single crown prepar-ation were recorded with TD (trueness 2.9 pm and precision 1.9 pm) and XL (surface accur-acy 20.3 & PLUSMN; 2.9 sum). The best trueness, precision, surface accuracy and absolute accuracy of three-unit preparations were recorded with TD (2.6 pm), XL (1.9 pm), OM (27.1 & PLUSMN; 5.2 pm) and TR3 (79.2 & PLUSMN; 19.6 pm), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in trueness between single-and multiple-unit preparations for any of the intraoral scanners (P > 0.05). A statistically significant difference in the surface accuracy between single and multiple prep-arations was found for TR2, TD, OM, DW, XL, DL and MD (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The trueness and precision of intraoral scanners for scanning three-unit prepar-ations were nearly the same as those for single-crown preparations; however, with the excep-tion of OS, PS and TR3, the surface accuracy of single-crown preparations was significantly better than that for three-unit preparations.