Abstract:There is considerable debate whether the domestic political institutions (specifically, the country s level of democracy) of the host developing country toward foreign investors are effective in establishing the credibility of commitments are still underway, researchers have also analyzed the effect of international institutions such as (GATT-WTO) membership and Bilateral Investment treaties (BIT) in their role of establishing the credibility of commitment to attract foreign investments. We argue that there are qualitative differences among various types of trade agreements and full-fledged trade agreements (FTA-CU) provide credibility to foreign investors and democracy level in the host country conditions this effect whereas the partial scope agreements (PSA) are not sufficient in providing credibility of commitments and not moderated by democracy. This paper analyses the impact of heterogeneous TAs, and their interaction with domestic institutions, on FDI inflows. Statistical analyses for 122 developing countries from 1970 to 2005 support this argument. The method adopted relies on fixed effects estimator which is robust to control endogeneity on a large panel dataset. The strict erogeneity of results by using a method suggested by Baier and Bergstrand (2007) and no feedback effect found in sample. The results state that (1) More the FTA-CU concluded, larger the amount of FDI inflows are attracted into the developing countries and PSA are insignificant in determining the FDI inflow; (2) FTA CU are complementary to democratic regime whereas the conditional effect of PSA with democracy on levels of FDI inflows is insignificant.

Spatial spillovers in trade agreement memberships: Does institutional proximity matter?

Total-Factor Spillovers, Similarities, and Competitions in the Petroleum Industry

Proximity Matters: Inter-Regional Knowledge Spillovers and Regional Industrial Diversification in China: Proximity matters

Product differentiation, interdependence, and the formation of PTAs

Exploring the Heterogeneous Impact of Trade Agreements on Trade: Depth Matters

Trade agreement depth, foreign direct investment, and the moderating role of property rights

Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities

The Political Economy of FDI flows into Developing Countries: Does the depth of International Trade Agreements Matter?

Institutional Distance,Neighboring Effects and Bilateral Trade:An Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Panel Model of “one Belt and One Road”Countries

Productivity spillovers among linked sectors

Spatial Spillovers of Regional Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Provinces

Impact of Deep Preferential Trade Agreements on Bilateral Value-Added Exports

Indirect channel of trade agreements in deepening global value chains

Amenities and Spatial Talent Distribution: Evidence from the Chinese It Industry

The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data

Intensity of economic relationships: a spatial econometric analysis of regional economic growth in China

Dynamic preferential trade agreement formation and the role of political economy

Deep trade agreements, production position distance and bilateral global value chain participation

Proximity Still Matters in Research Collaboration! Evidence from the Introduction of New Airline Routes and High-Speed Railways in China

Do good institutions enhance the effect of technological spillovers on productivity? Comparative evidence from developed and transition economies

Centralization of trade agreements network and global value chain participation