Influence of toothbrushing methods on tightening torque with healing abutments of different lengths: An in vitro study

Nurşen Şahin,Necati Kaleli,Çağrı Ural,Parvin Ahmadlı
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.05.017
IF: 4.148
2024-06-20
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Abstract:Statement of problem Early tightening torque at the implant-healing abutment interface is a recognized concern in implant treatment. However, little is known regarding the effects of toothbrushing methods on the interface established between the implant and healing abutments of different heights. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different toothbrushing methods on tightening torque for healing abutments of different heights. Material and methods A total of 60 implants (Bilimplant; Proimtech) were embedded in epoxy resin blocks. The following 6 test groups were established: healing abutments with manual toothbrush group (Oral B Pro Expert All in one; Oral B) and 4 mm height (MTB-4, (which served as the control); 6 mm height (MTB-6, which served as the control); sonic toothbrush group (Philips Sonicare 3100 Series; Philips Oral Healthcare) and 4 mm height (S-4); 6 mm height (S-6); oscillating/rotating toothbrush group (Oral B Smart 6 6000N; Oral B) and 4 mm height (OR-4) and 6 mm height (OR-6). Each specimen was tightened to 15 Ncm and brushed. The digital torque meter (Cap Torque Tester Series TT01; Mark10) was used to calculate the reverse torque values. Results The highest torque loss value in the average torque losses in the test groups was 1.3 (OR-6); the lowest was 0.3 (S-4). While a significant difference was found between groups S-4 and S-6 ( P =.018), no statistically significant difference was found among the other groups ( P >.05). Conclusions Torque loss was greater in the healing abutment with a height of 6 mm and with the oscillatory and rotational brushing method.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?