Reply to: Do not underestimate the cognitive benefits of exercise

Luis F. Ciria,Rafael Román-Caballero,Miguel A. Vadillo,Darias Holgado,Antonio Luque-Casado,Pandelis Perakakis,Daniel Sanabria

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01950-4

IF: 24.252

2024-08-21

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:replying to O. Dupuy et al. Nature Human Behaviour https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01949-x (2024) In response to our recent umbrella review 1 , Dupuy et al. 2 argue that the evidence supporting a cognitive benefit of physical exercise is conclusive. Our review, however, provides compelling evidence of critical issues in this literature (that is, underpowered designs, salami slicing, regression towards the mean, placebo-like effects, selective reporting and publication bias) that preclude this conclusion. Although it may seem contradictory, our findings are consistent with the assessment of the certainty of the available evidence contained in the scientific report of the Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Group (see the web annex evidence profiles 3 ), which underpins the World Health Organization guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour 4 . A closer examination of that report reveals that most of the evidence regarding the impact of physical activity on cognitive functions was rated as of low or very low certainty (that is, confidence in the effect estimates ranges from limited to very little; thus, the true effect may be, and is likely to be, substantially different from the estimate of the effect). For instance, the updated evaluation of the evidence for children and adolescents is based on four randomized controlled trials (RCTs; moderate certainty), five non-RCTs (very low certainty), nine longitudinal studies (low certainty) and six cross-sectional studies (very low certainty). For adults, six systematic reviews are rated as low or very low certainty, except for one review 5 , which was rated as moderate certainty and found no significant effect when considering active control groups. Our findings therefore seem to be consistent with the World Health Organization's report. Nonetheless, we present here additional evidence that further supports our conclusions.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences