Effects of an acute bout of exercise on cognitive function in adults with cognitive impairment: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Charlotte Scott,Mia Morgan,George Kelley,Samuel Nyman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.04.24314881
2024-10-04
Abstract:Objective: Examine the effects of an acute bout of physical exercise on cognitive function in adults with cognitive impairment (CI). Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of a single exercise session on cognitive function. Dual data abstraction, risk of bias assessment (RoB2) and strength of evidence assessment (GRADE) were conducted. Results were pooled using the inverse variance heterogeneity (IVhet) model or synthesised narratively. Data sources: Six databases from inception to July 2024: (1) PubMed, (2) SportDiscus, (3) PsychINFO, (4) Cochrane Central, (5) PEDro, (6) Embase. Eligibility criteria: RCT of acute exercise with male/female participants, aged 18+, and physician diagnosed or self-reported CI. Results: 15 studies (8 parallel group, 7 crossover) representing 500 participants were included, 10 in the meta-analysis. Acute exercise significantly improved executive function (moderate evidence, 9 studies, 330 participants, g=0.33, small effect, 95%CI [0.07, 0.59], p=0.01, I2=26.77, 95%CI [00.00, 65.82]. However, this was only for high risk of bias/crossover studies. Improvements in direction of benefit but non-significant for reaction time (very low evidence, 7 studies, 271 participants, g=0.17, small effect 95%CI [-0.20, 0.54], p=0.36, I2=50.18, 95%CI [00.00, 78.88]. Improvements in memory, but mixed evidence for attention, information processing and motor memory noted via narrative assessment. Conclusion: In a healthy population, acute exercise improves cognition. For adults with CI, we found evidence of improvement in executive function, reaction time and memory. However, the review was limited by the inclusion of studies primarily with high/some concerns for bias and very low/low strength of evidence.
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?