Does the Options Market Underreact to Firms' Left-Tail Risk?

Bei Chen,Quan Gan,Aurelio Vasquez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109024000309

IF: 4.337

2024-04-17

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis

Abstract://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0022109024000309/resource/name/firstPage-pdf-S0022109024000309a.jpg

economics,business, finance

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Tail Risk and Expected Stock Returns Around the World

Huaigang Long,Yanjian Zhu,Lifang Chen,Yuexiang Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2019.06.001

IF: 3.239

2019-01-01

Pacific-Basin Finance Journal

Abstract:In this study, we construct three proxies for tail risk observed in 39 markets between 1980 and 2015 to examine its effects on global pricing: TRKJ, following Kelly and Jiang (2014), TRVZ, following Van Oordt and Zhou (2016), and TRHL, following Huang et al. (2012) and Long et al. (2018). Both the portfolio analyses and Fama-MacBeth regressions show that TRKJ has no pricing effect in the international markets, but both TRVZ and TRHL has a negative relationship with future stock returns, especially in developed markets, which is inconsistent with common sense assumptions regarding the risk-return tradeoff. This negative relationship can be explained by the “idiosyncratic volatility puzzle” in the international markets other than the U.S. market. Moreover, a detailed analysis of the U.S. market suggests that the negative tail-risk–stock returns relationship in that market cannot be explained by the momentum effect, skewness, heterogeneous beliefs, the liquidity factor, leverage, or profitability, leaving an unsolved puzzle, which we call the “tail risk puzzle”
Idiosyncratic tail risk and expected stock returns: Evidence from the Chinese stock markets

Huaigang Long,Yuexiang Jiang,Yanjian Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.07.009

IF: 9.848

2018-01-01

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:• Tail risk is very important in asset pricing when investors are averse to disasters.• We estimate idiosyncratic tail risk according to the extreme value theory.• We find a robustly significant negative relationship between the idiosyncratic tail risk and the expected returns.• Turnover explains the negative effect of the idiosyncratic tail risk in Chinese stock markets.
Beware of the Crash Risk: Tail Beta and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in China

Huaigang Long,Adam Zaremba,Yuexiang Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1602717

IF: 1.916

2019-01-01

Applied Economics

Abstract:We investigate the pricing of systematic tail risk measured by tail beta in the Chinese equity market. Using an array of tests, we examine the performance of more than 3,300 stocks for the years 1999 through 2018. Contrary to evidence from developed markets, we demonstrate a strong negative relationship between the tail beta and future returns. The effect is robust to many considerations and cannot be explained by established pricing factors or alternative risk or illiquidity measures. We link our findings to specific characteristics of the Chinese stock market.
Tail risks, firm characteristics, and stock returns

Chen Wang,Xiong Xiong,Dehua Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101854

2022-10-01

Abstract:We focus on the left-tail (right-tail) risk of stocks, that is, the huge losses (gains) of financial assets with a small probability. The empirical results mainly reveal that both the left and the right tail risks of stocks in the Chinese market are negatively related to their one-month-ahead returns and Chinese investor is prone to chase winners. Moreover, the tail risk effect is more pronounced in stocks with more retail investors, less investor attention, and more transparency. Finally, we show that prospect theory and salience theory fail to capture the left tail effect, while the right tail effect is consistent with these theories.

business, finance
The Left-tail Risk and the Cross-section of Stock Returns: Evidence from China

Shun Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61173/tb0smp34

2024-08-14

Abstract:As a matter of fact, left-tail risk is a common risk in stock market. This study examines the linear correlation considering Value-at-Risk (VaR) and future stock returns within context of the Chinese main board stocks, particularly during periods marked by significant left-tail risk. Processing data from March 2014 to March 2024, this study concentrate to daily and monthly cross-section returns, along with other financial statistics. A suitable Fama-Macbeth regression using in this paper to exam the significance of left-tail risk. The key focus is to investigate the effect of VaR concerning future stock returns under downside market conditions, as indicated by the recent 23% drop in China’s benchmark CSI 300 index. The regression analysis indicates a significant negative correlation between VaR and future stock returns, suggesting that higher potential losses as indicated by VaR correspond with lower future returns. This outcome is contrary to traditional asset pricing theories which posit a positive risk-return relationship. The findings will attract attention of investors to consider extreme risk management of public stocks and contributes to the ongoing discussion on risk assessment in financial markets by highlighting the importance of integrating robust risk management tools like VaR in investment strategies, especially in volatile markets.
Common Firm-level Investor Fears: Evidence from Equity Options

Jozef Barunik,Mattia Bevilacqua,Michael Ellington

2023-09-08

Abstract:We identify a new type of risk, common firm-level investor fears, from commonalities within the cross-sectional distribution of individual stock options. We define firm-level fears that link with upward price movements as good fears, and those relating to downward price movements as bad fears. Such information is different to market fears that we extract from index options. Stocks with high sensitivities to common firm-level investor fears earn lower returns, with investors demanding a higher compensation for exposure to common bad fears relative to common good fears. Risk premium estimates for common bad fears range from -5.63% to -4.92% per annum.

General Finance
The effect of limited attention and risk attitude on left-tail reversal: Empirical results from a-share data in China

Jun Wang,Xiuna Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102089

IF: 9.848

2022-05-01

Finance Research Letters

Abstract:This study explores the influence of investors’ attention and risk attitude on the left-tail anomaly. The portfolio analysis method is applied to test the existence of tail-risk reversal and the underlying influential mechanisms. Considering China's price-limit-rule, we propose idiosyncratic volatility-adjusted value-at-risk as a proxy for left-tail risk and encounter significant left-tail reversal. Empirical analysis reveals the reversal is negatively affected by effective attention and positively by risk aversion. Moreover, the joint effect of attention and risk aversion greatly strengthens the reversal. We verify the existence of a tail-risk premium in China and present behavioral factors to explain and enhance it.

business, finance
Prior Consequences and Subsequent Risk Taking: New Field Evidence from the Taiwan Futures Exchange

Yu-Jane Liu,Chih-Ling Tsai,Ming-Chun Wang,Ning Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1131

IF: 5.4

2010-01-01

Management Science

Abstract:We use a data set from market participants in the Taiwan Stock Exchange Capitalization Weighted Stock Index options markets to demonstrate a strong positive relationship between prior trading outcomes and subsequent risk taking. In particular, investors in this market take above-average risks in afternoon trading after morning gains. The phenomenon is prevalent in all three types of market makers' accounts and across different types of market participants. Our findings are consistent with the argument that prior outcomes affect subsequent risk taking through a relationship that is sensitive to the model parameters (i.e., expected return, trading period, and curvature of the value function), because prospect theory can predict both increased and decreased levels of subsequent risk taking. We provide possible explanations behind the phenomenon and discuss reasons for the variety of findings in the existing literature.
Left-Tail Momentum: Limited Attention of Individual Investors and Expected Equity Returns

Yigit Atilgan,Turan G. Bali,K. Ozgur Demirtas,A. Doruk Gunaydin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3070777

2017-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper documents a significantly negative cross-sectional relation between left-tail risk and future returns on individual stocks trading in the U.S. and international countries. We provide a behavioral explanation to this anomaly based on the idea that investors underestimate the persistence in left-tail risk and overprice stocks with large recent losses. Thus, low returns in the left-tail of the distribution persist into the future causing left-tail return momentum. We find that the left-tail risk anomaly is stronger for stocks that are more likely to be held by retail investors, that receive less investor attention and that are costlier to arbitrage.
Tail risk aversion and backwardation of index futures

Jufang Liang,Dan Yang,Qian Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2024.2330612

IF: 1.986

2024-04-13

Quantitative Finance

Abstract:We show that tail risk aversion, proxied by the skewness risk premium implied from the SSE 50 ETF options market, explains a significant proportion of the unusually deep backwardation of index futures during the 2015 Chinese stock market crash, while traditional factors such as non-synchronous trading, spot return, volatility and liquidity, all fail to explain the backwardation. These empirical results imply that investors' concern over the crash risk causes speculators to charge a high 'insurance premium' on hedgers. On the other hand, short-sale constraints, namely high security borrowing costs and other barriers, prevent reverse arbitrage such that the deep backwardation of index futures persists.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods,mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,business, finance
Is Investor Misreaction Economically Significant? Evidence from Short- and Long-term S&P 500 Index Options

C Cao,HT Li,F Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20170

2005-01-01

Abstract:AbstractSeveral recent studies present evidence of investor misreaction in the options market. Although the interpretation of their results is still controversial, the important question of economic significance has not been fully addressed. Here this gap is addressed by formulating regression‐based tests to identify misreaction and its duration and constructing trading strategies to exploit the empirical patterns of misreaction. Regular S&P 500 index options and long‐dated S&P 500 LEAPS are used to find an underreaction that on average dissipates over the course of 3 trading days and an increasing misreaction that peaks after four consecutive daily variance shocks of the same sign. Option trading strategies based on these findings produce economically significant abnormal returns in the range of 1–3% per day. However, they are not profitable in the presence of transaction costs. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 25:717–752, 2005
Tail Risk Concerns Everywhere

George P. Gao,Xiaomeng Lu,Zhaogang Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2949

IF: 5.4

2019-01-01

Management Science

Abstract:We show that the beta with respect to an index of global ex ante tail risk concerns (𝔾ℝ𝕀𝕏), which we construct using out-of-the-money options on multiple global assets, negatively drives cross-sectional return variations across asset classes, including international equity indices, foreign currencies, and government bond futures. The pricing power of 𝔾ℝ𝕀𝕏 becomes stronger when more asset-class-level tail risk concerns are incorporated in the index construction. 𝔾ℝ𝕀𝕏 also dominates asset-class-level tail risk concerns in pricing assets within each asset class. These evidences imply that the pricing effect of tail risk concerns works predominantly as a global channel. The 𝔾ℝ𝕀𝕏 pricing effect is distinct from that of tail risk factors based on historical realizations, consistent with the interpretation that tail risk concerns likely reflect investors’ ex ante subjective belief about tail risk. This paper was accepted by Neng Wang, finance.
Prospect Theory and the Risk-Return Tradeoff

Huijun Wang,Jinghua Yan,Jianfeng Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2120809

2012-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper studies the cross-sectional risk-return tradeoff in the stock market. One of the most fundamental principles in finance is that risk averse investors demand compensation for bearing risk. However, instead of a positive risk-return relation, recent empirical studies document a low-risk anomaly, i.e., low-risk firms tend to earn higher average returns.
Options, option repricing in managerial compensation: Their effects on corporate investment risk

Nengjiu Ju,Hayne Leland,Lemma W. Senbet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.003

IF: 6.1

2014-01-01

Journal of Corporate Finance

Abstract:While stock options are commonly used in managerial compensation to provide desirable incentives, they can create adverse incentives to distort the choice of investment risk. Relative to the risk level that maximizes firm value, call options in a compensation contract can induce too much or too little corporate risk-taking, depending on managerial risk aversion and the underlying investment technology. We show that inclusion of lookback call options in compensation packages has desirable countervailing effects on managerial choice of corporate risk policies and can induce risk policies that increase shareholder wealth. We argue that lookback call options are analogous to the observed practice of option repricing.
Do Stock Options Overcome Managerial Risk Aversion? Evidence from Exercises of Executive Stock Options

Randall A. Heron,Erik Lie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2485

IF: 5.4

2017-09-01

Management Science

Abstract:We report that the probability that executives exercise options early decreases with the volatility of the underlying stock return. We interpret this to mean that executives’ subjective option value increases with volatility and that option grants increase executives’ risk appetite. Further decomposition reveals that the results are most pronounced for idiosyncratic volatility, consistent with our conjecture that executives believe they can better predict or influence the resolution of idiosyncratic uncertainty than systematic uncertainty and, thus, favor the former. Data are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2495 . This paper was accepted by Wei Jiang, finance.

management,operations research & management science
Left-tail momentum and right-tail reversal: does trading attenuate or exacerbate the anomaly?

Mingmao Deng,Zhiyuan Wang,Xiaoyuan Wan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2395463

2024-08-30

Applied Economics Letters

Abstract:The literature documents that both left-tail risk and right-tail risk are negatively related to future stock returns in China, which are referred to as left-tail momentum and right-tail reversal. In this paper, we investigate the effect of investor trading on tail-risk anomalies. Dividing stocks into subsamples based on turnover, we find that both left-tail momentum and right-tail reversal are significant only among high turnover stocks and insignificant among low turnover stocks. The findings suggest that investor trading exacerbates rather than attenuates tail-risk anomalies, supporting behavioural bias as a plausible explanation.

economics
Options, Option Repricing and Severance Packages in Managerial Compensation: Their Effects on Corporate Risk

Nengjiu Ju,Hayne E. Leland,Lemma W. Senbet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.346920

2003-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:While stock options are commonly used in managerial compensation to provide desirable incentives, their adverse effects have not been widely appreciated. We show that a call-type contract creates incentives to distort the choice of investment risk. Relative to the risk level that maximizes firm value, a call option contract can induce too much or too little corporate risk-taking, depending on managerial risk aversion and the underlying investment technology. We show that including additional compensation features of option repricing and/or severance packages has desirable countervailing effects on managerial choice of corporate risk policies. We argue that lookback call options are analogous to the observed practice of option repricing, and put options are analogous to severance packages. Such complex option-like features in managerial contracts can induce risk policies that increase shareholder wealth.
The impact of the tail risk of demand on corporate investment: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

Xiangyun Xu,Xing Li,Jie Meng,Xueqi Hu,Yingfan Ge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102342

IF: 3.239

2024-03-30

Pacific-Basin Finance Journal

Abstract:The tail risk of demand over the past certain periods not only affect entrepreneurs' expectations on future demand uncertainty, increase the option value of "waiting an see" for delay investment, but also affect entrepreneurs' confidence and risk appetite by adjusting the worst-case scenario in the "demand belief set", thereby further inhibiting investment. Utilizing the year-on-year sales growth data of various manufacturing industries in China, and the General Pareto Distribution method of Extreme Value Theory to estimate tail-index parameter and tail threshold as proxies for the tail risk of industry-level demand. Combined with the firm level data, our empirical results show that the tail risk indeed affect firm investment negatively, especially after the outbreak of global financial crisis, but such focal effect is stronger for firms with non-state ownership, small size, lower productivity and stricter financing constraints. Expansionary macroeconomic policies such as monetary and fiscal policy in periods of high tail risk have a higher incentive effect on firm investment, which provides more evidence for the effectiveness of macroeconomic policies during the economic recessions.

business, finance
Options , Option Repricing and Severance Packages in Managerial Compensation : Their Effects on Corporate Investment Risk

Nengjiu Ju,Hayne Leland,Lemma W. Senbet

2004-01-01

Abstract:While stock options are commonly used in managerial compensation to provide desirable incentives, their adverse effects have not been widely appreciated. We show that a call-type contract creates incentives to distort the choice of investment risk. Relative to the risk level that maximizes firm value, a call option contract can induce too much or too little corporate risk-taking, depending on managerial risk aversion and the underlying investment technology. We show that, including additional compensation features of option repricing and/or severance packages, has desirable countervailing effects on managerial choice of corporate risk policies. We argue that lookback call options are analogous to the observed practice of option repricing, and put options are analogous to severance packages. Such complex option-like features in managerial contracts can induce risk policies that increase shareholder wealth.
Tail Nonlinearly Transformed Risk Measure and Its Application

Zhiping Chen,Li Yang,Daobao Xu,Qianhui Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-011-0271-2

2011-01-01

Abstract:This paper discusses risk measurement and portfolio selection under the mean-risk framework. Through introducing a nonlinear convex transformation to large losses, we propose a new class of risk measures which are convex and monotone. We demonstrate the new risk measure's favorable financial and mathematical properties, and consider its estimation in practice and relevant consistent and asymptotic issues. A realistic portfolio selection model based on the new risk measure is then established with typical market frictions taken into account simultaneously. Based on trade data from Chinese stock markets and American stock markets over stable and volatile periods, respectively, both in-sample and out-of-sample empirical studies are carried out. Theoretical and empirical results show that the new risk measure and the corresponding portfolio selection model can not only reflect different investors' risk averse attitudes and control the fat-tail phenomenon of the return distribution, but also find a realistic optimal portfolio with superior performance and robustness than the corresponding optimal portfolio obtained under the expected shortfall risk measure.

Does the Options Market Underreact to Firms' Left-Tail Risk?

Tail Risk and Expected Stock Returns Around the World

Idiosyncratic tail risk and expected stock returns: Evidence from the Chinese stock markets

Beware of the Crash Risk: Tail Beta and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns in China

Tail risks, firm characteristics, and stock returns

The Left-tail Risk and the Cross-section of Stock Returns: Evidence from China

Common Firm-level Investor Fears: Evidence from Equity Options

The effect of limited attention and risk attitude on left-tail reversal: Empirical results from a-share data in China

Prior Consequences and Subsequent Risk Taking: New Field Evidence from the Taiwan Futures Exchange

Left-Tail Momentum: Limited Attention of Individual Investors and Expected Equity Returns

Tail risk aversion and backwardation of index futures

Is Investor Misreaction Economically Significant? Evidence from Short- and Long-term S&P 500 Index Options

Tail Risk Concerns Everywhere

Prospect Theory and the Risk-Return Tradeoff

Options, option repricing in managerial compensation: Their effects on corporate investment risk

Do Stock Options Overcome Managerial Risk Aversion? Evidence from Exercises of Executive Stock Options

Left-tail momentum and right-tail reversal: does trading attenuate or exacerbate the anomaly?

Options, Option Repricing and Severance Packages in Managerial Compensation: Their Effects on Corporate Risk

The impact of the tail risk of demand on corporate investment: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms

Options , Option Repricing and Severance Packages in Managerial Compensation : Their Effects on Corporate Investment Risk

Tail Nonlinearly Transformed Risk Measure and Its Application